<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2393-6886</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Uruguaya de Antropología y Etnografía]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. urug. Antropología y Etnografía]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2393-6886</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Antropología. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. UdelaR.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2393-68862020000200051</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29112/ruae.v5.n2.3</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La emergencia disciplinar de los Science and Technology Studies, la génesis híbrida del &#8216;giro ontológico&#8217; y algunos debates contemporáneos]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The disciplinary emergence of Science and Technology Studies, the hybrid genesis of the &#8216;ontological turn&#8217; and some contemporary debates]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O surgimento disciplinar dos Science and Technology Studies, a gênese híbrida da virada ontológica e alguns debates contemporâneos]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uribe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David Antolinez]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de la República FHCE Fac. de Psicología de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia. Maestría en Ciencias Humanas, Programa de Posgrados]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Uruguay</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>51</fpage>
<lpage>67</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2393-68862020000200051&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2393-68862020000200051&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2393-68862020000200051&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN El &#8216;giro ontológico&#8217; ha sido una reciente corriente intelectual que ha recibido atención y críticas tanto de la filosofía como de la antropología. Realmente, este movimiento no hace parte de ninguna de esas disciplinas, sino que se constituyó como la matriz teórica de una nueva disciplina: los Science and Technology Studies. A medida que estos ganaban legitimidad académica y definían su identidad profesional, cierta inconmensurabilidad emergió entre esta comunidad científica y las otras disciplinas que se veían amenazadas por esta nueva corriente. Este artículo hace un recuento histórico de la construcción paralela de los Science and Technology Studies y el &#8216;giro ontológico&#8217;, haciendo hincapié en la propuesta de Bruno Latour, el primero en articular teorías ontológicas con metodologías etnográficas, gesto fundacional de los Science and Technology Studies. También se muestran algunas críticas recientes realizadas al &#8216;giro ontológico&#8217;, que buscan deshacer esta hibridación entre filosofía y antropología. Se concluye que, pese a lo certero de algunas de estas críticas, los Science and Technology Studies logran mantener cierto dominio disciplinar, mientras que el &#8216;giro ontológico&#8217;, en tanto matriz teórica de esta nueva disciplina, sí debe hacer frente a los desafíos contemporáneos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT The &#8216;ontological turn&#8217; has been a recent intellectual trend that has received attention and criticism from both philosophy and anthropology. Actually, this movement is not part of any of those disciplines, but rather was constituted as the theoretical matrix of a new discipline: Science and Technology Studies. As these gained academic legitimacy and defined their professional identity, certain incommensurability emerged between this scientific community and the other disciplines that were threatened by this new trend. This article makes a historical account of the parallel construction of Science and Technology Studies and the &#8216;ontological turn&#8217;, emphasizing the proposal of Bruno Latour, the first to articulate ontological theories with ethnographic methodologies, a founding gesture of Science and Technology Studies. Some recent criticisms made of the &#8216;ontological turn&#8217; are also shown, which seek to undo this hybridization between philosophy and anthropology. It is concluded that, despite the accuracy of some of these criticisms, Science and Technology Studies manage to maintain a certain disciplinary dominance, while the &#8216;ontological turn&#8217;, as a theoretical matrix of this new discipline, must face those contemporary challenges.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[RESUMO A &#8216;virada ontológica&#8217; tem sido uma tendência intelectual recente que tem recebido atenção e críticas da filosofia e da antropologia. Na verdade, esse movimento não faz parte de nenhuma dessas disciplinas, mas se constitui como a matriz teórica de uma nova disciplina: os Science and Technology Studies. À medida que estas adquiriam legitimidade acadêmica e definiam sua identidade profissional, havia uma incomensurabilidade entre essa comunidade científica e as demais disciplinas ameaçadas por essa nova tendência. Este artigo faz um relato histórico da construção paralela dos Science and Technology Studies e da &#8216;virada ontológica&#8217;, enfatizando a proposta de Bruno Latour, o primeiro a articular teorias ontológico com metodologias etnográficas, gesto fundador dos Estudos de Ciência e Tecnologia. Também são apresentadas algumas críticas recentes à &#8216;virada ontológica&#8217;, que buscam desfazer essa hibridização entre filosofia e antropologia. Conclui-se que, apesar do acerto de algumas dessas críticas, os Science and Technology Studies conseguem manter certo domínio disciplinar, enquanto a &#8216;virada ontológica&#8217;, como matriz teórica desta nova disciplina, deve enfrentar desafios contemporâneos.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Science and Technology Studies]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Ontología]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Etnografía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Inconmensurabilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Purificación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Science and Technology Studies]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ontology]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ethnography]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Incommensurability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Purification]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Science and Technology Studies]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ontology]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ethnography]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Incommensurability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Purification]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biagioli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Galileo, courtier]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bloor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Knowledge and social imagery]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bloor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Anti-Latour]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Studies in History and Philosophy of Science]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>81-112</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Braudel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Histoire et science sociales: La longe durée]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annales. Histoire, Science Sociales]]></source>
<year>1958</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>725-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cartwright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[How the Laws of Physics Lie]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Collins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yearley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Epistemological chicken]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pickering, Andrew (ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<page-range>301-27</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Descola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Construyendo naturalezas, ecología sibólica y práctica social]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[P. Descola. y G. Pálsson. (2001). Naturaleza y Sociedad. Perspectivas antropológicas]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<page-range>101-23</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Siglo XXI]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Everett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Current Anthropology,]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>621-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feyerabend]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[New Left Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foucault]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Les Mots et les Choses]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Éditions Gallimard]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Graeber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fetishism as social creativity. Or, fetishes are gods in the process of construction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anthropological Theory]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>407-38</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Graeber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radical alterity is just another way of saying &#8220;reality&#8221;]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Ethnographic Theory]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>1-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haraway]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Duke University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Open Court]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Melbourne ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Re.press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Etnografía virtual.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial UOC]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holbraad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ontology, ethnography, archaeology: an afterword on the ontography of things.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cambridge Archaeological Journal]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>431-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holbraad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wastell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henare]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Thinking Through Things: Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iglesias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La filosofía de I. Hacking: El giro hacia la práctica en la Filosofía de la Ciencia.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>26</numero>
<issue>26</issue>
<page-range>9-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knorr-Cetina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuhn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuhn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kuhn, T.S. (2000). The Road since Structure]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<page-range>33-57</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kusch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language as calculus vs. language as universal medium: a study in Husserl, Heidegger, and Gadamer]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boston ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kluwer Academic Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kusch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sociology of science: Bloor, Collins, Latour]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Brown, J.R. (ed.) Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>168-87</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Continuum]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kusch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Synthese]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<numero>194</numero>
<issue>194</issue>
<page-range>4687-703</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Science in Action]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambrigde ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[We Have Never Been Modern]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[One More Turn after the Social Turn: Easing Science Studies into the Non.Modern World]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[McMullin, E. (ed.) The Social Dimensions of Science. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<page-range>272-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The 'Pedofil' of Boa Vista: A Photo-Philosophical Montage]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Common Knowledge]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>145-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aramis, or the love of technology]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambrigde ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[For Bloor and Beyond - a Reply to David Bloor's Anti-Latour.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Studies in History and Philosophy of Science]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>113-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Critical Inquire]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>225-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network Theory]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Could we have our materialism back, please?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Isis]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<numero>98</numero>
<issue>98</issue>
<page-range>138-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Perspectivism: &#8216;Type&#8217; or &#8216;bomb&#8217;?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anthropology Today]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>1-2</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Polity Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weibel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MIT Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Woolgar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Laboratory Life]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New Jersey ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Princeton University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lévi-Strauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Antropología estructural]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<edition>5ta</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Eudeba]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lévi-Strauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Tristes trópicos]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Paidós Ibérica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nota editorial. Etnografía y estudios de la ciencia y la tecnología: encuentros, inspiraciones y posibilidades conectadas.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<numero>26</numero>
<issue>26</issue>
<page-range>8-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meillassoux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Q.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Après la finitude]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editions du Seuil]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mialet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Where would STS be without Latour? What would be missing?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Social Studies of Science]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<page-range>456-61</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Duke University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pickering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Science as practice and culture]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reynoso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El surgimiento de la antropología posmoderna]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gedisa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sokal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bricmont]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fashionable Nonsense]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Profile Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tsing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New Jersey ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Princeton University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Fraassen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Scientific Image]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Viveiros de Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Metafísicas Caníbales. Líneas de antropología post-estructural]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Katz Editorial]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Viveiros de Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Who is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? Some Comments on an Ongoing Anthropological Debate.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>2-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wagner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Facts force you to believe in them; perspectives encourage you to believe out of them]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Viveiros de Castro, E. (2015). The Relative Native. Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>295-324</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[HAU Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whitehead]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Process and Reality]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Free Press.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
