<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1688-499X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Urug. Cienc. Polít.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1688-499X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Ciencia Política.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1688-499X2020000100015</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26851/rucp.29.1.2</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Cortes superiores y redes sociales en América Latina]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[High courts and social media in Latin America]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Llanos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mariana]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cordula Tibi]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,giga (German Institute of Global and Area Studies) Instituto de Estudios Latinoamericanos ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,giga (German Institute of Global and Area Studies) Instituto de Estudios Latinoamericanos ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>15</fpage>
<lpage>48</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1688-499X2020000100015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1688-499X2020000100015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1688-499X2020000100015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: Este artículo es un primer paso hacia la comprensión del uso de los medios sociales por parte de las cortes constitucionales y supremas de América Latina. Algunas de estas cortes se han destacado a nivel mundial como precursoras en el uso de tales medios. Se realizó un análisis sistemático y comparativo de 17 cortes durante el lapso de un año, con el foco en dos cuestiones: por un lado, en la intensidad con que utilizaron las plataformas más relevantes -Twitter, Facebook y YouTube- y, por otro, en el nivel de influencia de cada corte. Como resultado, se presenta una clasificación de las cortes que enfatiza que existen diferencias de desempeño: las cortes más influyentes no son necesariamente las más activas, pero hacen un uso muy diferenciado de las redes sociales. En cambio, las menos influyentes muestran gran dispersión en torno al nivel de actividad. Asimismo, exploramos de manera preliminar la relación entre el nivel de confianza en los poderes judiciales y la intensidad del uso e influencia de las cortes en las redes. Observamos que las cortes que enfrentan mayor desconfianza son moderadamente más activas y tienden a tener menos influencia. Dos motivos podrían explicar este comportamiento: la búsqueda de autopromoción estratégica; y un ideal de transparencia institucional.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: In this article we take a first step towards understanding the use of social media by constitutional and supreme courts in Latin America. Some Latin American courts stand out worldwide for their active online presence. We present the first comparative evaluation of the social media presence of 17 Latin American high courts. We evaluate the intensity of the current use of the most relevant online platforms - Twitter, Facebook and YouTube - and explore the level of influence each court has developed in these networks. As a result, we present a classification of the courts that emphasizes that there are performance differences: the most influential courts are not necessarily the most active ones, but they make a very differentiated use of social media. In contrast, the least influential ones show great dispersion around the level of activity. Additionally, we present a preliminarily evaluation of the relationship between the level of trust in the judiciaries and both the intensity of the use and the level of influence of courts in social networks. We see that courts with higher levels of distrust are moderately more active and tend to have less influence. Two motivations could explain the court behavior in social media: First, the search for strategic self-promotion. Second, an ideal of institutional transparency.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cortes constitucionales y supremas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[legitimidad institucional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[medios sociales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[constitutional and supreme courts]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[institutional legitimacy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[social media]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ayd&#305;n]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[&#350;ekercio&#287;lu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Public Confidence in the Judiciary: The Interaction between Political Awareness and Level of Democracy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Democratization]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>634-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bareiro de Módica desiste de inconstitucionalidad]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ABC Color]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Performing the Court: Public Hearings and the Politics of Judicial Transparency in Argentina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Political and Legal Anthropology Review]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>326-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Basabe-Serrano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Informal Institutions and Judicial Independence in Paraguay, 1954-2011]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Law &amp; Policy]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>350-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benesh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Politics]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>697-707</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bricker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Vision of Judicial Review. A Comparative Examination of Courts and Policy in Democracies]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Colchester, Reino Unido ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ecpr Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruns]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[After the &#8216;APIcalypse&#8217;: Social Media Platforms and their Fight against Critical Scholarly Research]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Information, Communication &amp; Society]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1544-66</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caldeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Political Science Review]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1209-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caldeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gibson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Political Science]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>635-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Corporación Latinobarómetro</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Informe 2018]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santiago de Chile, Chile ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Corporación Latinobarómetro]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, Reino Unido ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Fine Licht]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Naurin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esaiasson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gilljam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context&#8208;Bound Relationship]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Governance]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>111-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Driscoll]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[There is no Legitimacy Crisis: Support for Judicial Institutions in Modern Latin America]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista saap]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>361-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Easton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[British Journal of Political Science]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>435-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Epstein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knight]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Choices Justices Make]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington, dc, ee. uu. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[cq Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Falcao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O stf e a agenda pública nacional: de outro desconhecido a supremo protagonista?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lua Nova]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<numero>88</numero>
<issue>88</issue>
<page-range>429-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La Corte ante el desafío de actuar con total transparencia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[abc Color]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gargarella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Deliberative Democracy, Dialogic Justice and the Promise of Social and Economic Rights]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alviar García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klare]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>105-20</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres, Inglaterra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garoupa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ginsburg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Judicial Reputation. A Comparative Theory]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago, Londres, ee. uu., Inglaterra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gibson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Electing Judges. The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago, Londres, ee. uu., Inglaterra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gibson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reassessing the Institutional Legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court: New Evidence, Revised Theory]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[South African Journal of Political Studies]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>53-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gibson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caldeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Politics]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gibson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caldeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Politics]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>429-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gibson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caldeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On the Legitimacy of National High Courts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Political Science Review]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>92</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>343-58</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gloppen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Accountability Function of the Courts in Tanzania and Zambia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gloppen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gargarella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Skaar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Democratization and the Judiciary. The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<page-range>112-36</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres, Inglaterra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Frank Cass]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hilbink]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Origins of Positive Judicial Independence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[World Politics]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>587-621</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holtz-Bacha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Federal Constitutional Court and the Media]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>101-18</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, Reino Unido ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ingram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Uncommon Transparency: the Supreme Court, Media Relations, and Public Opinion in Brazil]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[R. Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. Taras]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>58-80</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, Reino Unido ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kearney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[rtweet: Collecting Twitter Data. R package version 0.6.9]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Landau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Beyond Judicial Independence: The Construction of Judicial Power in Colombia]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[ee. uu. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Llanos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tibi Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heyl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stroh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Informal Interference in the Judiciary in New Democracies: a Comparison of six African and Latin American Cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Democratization]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1236-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pou-Giménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Changing the Channel: Broadcasting Deliberations in the Mexican Supreme Court]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>209-34</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, Reino Unido ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruíbal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Self-Restraint in Search of Legitimacy: The Reform of the Argentine Supreme Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Latin American Politics and Society]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>59-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salzman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramsey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Judging the Judiciary: Understanding Public Confidence in Latin American Courts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Latin American Politics and Society]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>73-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scribner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Judicial Communication: (Re)Constructing Legitimacy in Argentina]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>14-38</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, Reino Unido ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Segal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spaeth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Supreme Court: The Attitudinal Model]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York, ee. uu. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sesiones son públicas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[abc Color]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Staton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York, ee. uu. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Introduction: Judges and Journalists and the Spaces in Between]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justices and Journalists: The Global Perspective]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>1-13</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, Reino Unido ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tibi Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Llanos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Between Independence and Control: Recent Developments within the Judiciary in Latin America]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González-Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Economy, Politics and Governance : Challenges for the 21 st Century]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>101-15</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York, ee. uu. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Nova Science Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wells]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[&#8216;Sociological Legitimacy&#8217; in Supreme Court Opinions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Washington and Lee Law Review]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>1011-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
