<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1688-7026</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Psicol. Conoc. Soc.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1688-7026</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de la República]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1688-70262019000200217</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26864/pcs.v9.n2.13</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Open Psychology: transparency and reproducibility]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Psicología abierta: transparencia y reproducibilidad]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Psicologia Aberta: transparência e reprodutibilidade]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Derksen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maarten]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of Groningen  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Netherlands</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>217</fpage>
<lpage>225</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1688-70262019000200217&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1688-70262019000200217&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1688-70262019000200217&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: I describe the attempt by a group of psychologists to reform the discipline into an Open Science (which I will call 'Open Psychology'). I will first argue that their particular version of Open Science reflects the problems that gave rise to it and that it tries to solve. Then I will describe the infrastructure that this group of people is putting in place to facilitate transparency. An important function of this infrastructure is to restrict what are called 'researcher degrees of freedom'. In Psychology, transparency is as much about closing down as it is about opening up. I will then focus on the flagship project of Open Psychology, the Reproducibility Project. According to the Open Psychologists, the neglect of replication is at the core of Psychology's current problems, and their online infrastructure offers the perfect framework to facilitate replication and give it a place in the field's research process. But replication, I will argue, is not just an epistemological, methodological issue: it implies a particular ontology and tries to enact it. The Reproducibility Project, and Open Psychology generally, can be considered as social experiments, that attempt not only to reform Psychology, but also to perform a new psychological object.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: En este artículo describo el intento de un grupo de psicólogos de reformar la disciplina en una Ciencia Abierta (la cual llamo 'Psicología Abierta'). Primero, argumentaré que su versión particular de Ciencia Abierta refleja los problemas que le dieron origen y los cuales ella intenta resolver. A continuación, describiré la infraestructura que este grupo de personas está implementando para facilitar esta transparencia. Una función importante de esta infraestructura es restringir los llamados 'grados de libertad del investigador'. En Psicología, la transparencia buscada se refiere tanto a delimitar cuanto sobre expandir las investigaciones. Posteriormente, me centraré en el proyecto emblemático de la Psicología Abierta, el Proyecto de Reproducibilidad. De acuerdo con los Psicólogos Abiertos, el descuido acerca de la replicación está en el corazón de los problemas actuales de la Psicología, y su infraestructura en línea ofrece el soporte perfecto para facilitar la replicación y darle un lugar en el proceso de investigación de campo. Pero la replicación, argumentaré, no es sólo una cuestión epistemológica, metodológica: implica una ontología particular e intenta ponerla en acción. El Proyecto de Reproducibilidad, y la Psicología Abierta de forma general, pueden ser considerados experimentos sociales, cuyo esfuerzo reside no sólo en reformar la Psicología, sino también en realizar/performar un nuevo objeto.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo: Descrevo a tentativa de um grupo de psicólogos de reformar a disciplina em uma Ciência Aberta (a qual eu nomeio &#8216;Psicologia Aberta&#8217;). Primeiro, argumentarei que sua versão particular de Ciência Aberta reflete os problemas que lhe deram origem e os quais ela tenta resolver. Em seguida, irei descrever a infraestrutura que esse grupo de pessoas está implementando para facilitar a transparência. Uma função importante dessa infraestrutura é restringir os chamados &#8216;graus de liberdade do pesquisador&#8217;. Em Psicologia, transparência é tanto sobre delimitar quanto sobre expandir. Posteriormente, focarei no projeto emblemático da Psicologia Aberta, o Projeto de Reprodutibilidade. De acordo com os Psicólogos Abertos, a negligência acerca da replicação está no cerne dos problemas atuais da Psicologia, e sua infraestrutura online oferece o suporte perfeito para facilitar a replicação e dar a ela um lugar no processo de pesquisa de campo. Mas a replicação, argumentarei, não é apenas uma questão epistemológica, metodológica: implica uma ontologia particular e tenta operá-la. O Projeto de Reprodutibilidade, e a Psicologia Aberta de forma geral, podem ser considerados experimentos sociais, cujo esforço reside não apenas em reformar a Psicologia, mas também em performar um novo objeto psicológico.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Open science]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[replication]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[crisis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[performativity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Ciencia abierta]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[replicación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[crisis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[performatividad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ciência aberta;replicação;crise]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[performatividade]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Personality and Social Psychology]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>100</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>407-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calvert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ownership and sharing in synthetic biology: A &#8220;diverse ecology&#8221; of the open and the proprietary?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BioSocieties]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>169-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doyen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pichon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.-L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cleeremans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Behavioral Priming: It&#8217;s All in the Mind, but Whose Mind?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferguson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heene]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication bias and Psychological Science&#8217;s Aversion to the Null]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspectives on Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>555-61</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Discipline Through Method: Recent history and philosophy of scientificpsychology (1950-2018)]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Utrecht University]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gunnarsdóttir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Scientific Journal Publications On the Role of Electronic Preprint Exchange in the Distribution of Scientific Literature]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Social Studies of Science]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>549-79</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[John]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Loewenstein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prelec]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth-Telling]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>524-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of &#8220;open science&#8221;]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BioSocieties]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>140-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Latour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[When things strike back: a possible contribution of &#8220;science studies&#8221; to the social sciences]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[British Journal Of Sociology]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>107-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mulkay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gilbert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Replication and Mere Replication]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy of the Social Sciences]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>21-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nosek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spies]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Motyl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspectives on Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>615-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Open Science Collaboration</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Maximizing the Reproducibility of Your Research]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lilienfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waldman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Science Under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wiley]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pashler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspectives on Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>531-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simmons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simonsohn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[False-Positive Psychology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1359-66</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simmons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simonsohn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A 21 Word Solution]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dialogue. The Official Newsletter of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>4-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Srivastava]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Making progress in the hardest science]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Hardest Science]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stroebe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Postmes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spears]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspectives on Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>670-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stroebe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspectives on Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>59-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Willinsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[First Monday]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
