<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1688-0390</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Médica del Uruguay]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Méd. Urug.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1688-0390</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sindicato Médico del Uruguay]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1688-03902020000200099</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29193/rmu.36.2.5</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Valor de la imagenología (TC y PET-TC) en el diagnóstico de la carcinomatosis peritoneal. Estudio preliminar]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Diagnostic value of CT and Pet CT for detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Preliminary study]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Valor das técnicas de imagem (TC y Pet-TC) no diagnóstico da carcinomatose peritoneal. Estudo preliminar.]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Álvaro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Telles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leandro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cantera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gabriela Rodríguez]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fernando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis Ruso]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de la República Hospital Pasteur. Facultad de Medicina Clínica Quirúrgica &#8220;1&#8221;, Prof. Dr. Fernando González]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Montevideo ]]></addr-line>
<country>Uruguay</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>99</fpage>
<lpage>121</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1688-03902020000200099&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1688-03902020000200099&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1688-03902020000200099&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: En la evaluación de la carcinomatosis peritoneal (CP) la imagenología contribuye al diagnóstico preciso de compromiso peritoneal, aunque su eficacia es aún limitada. La tomografía computada (TC) es el estudio de imagen más utilizado y el PET-TC es cada vez más solicitado en la valoración de diferentes neoplasias. El objetivo del presente trabajo es evaluar el rendimiento de la TC y el PET-TC en el diagnóstico de CP en tumores digestivos y ginecológicos.  Material y método:  estudio retrospectivo, observacional, de 11 casos operados de CP en los que previamente se había realizado TC o PET-TC, o ambos. Se analizan los resultados de los estudios imagenológicos por separado y en conjunto, y se comparan con los hallazgos intraoperatorios y anatomopatológicos.  Resultados:  la TC fue concordante en 8 de 10 casos (S 78%, E 100%, VPP 100%, VPN 33%), mientras que el PET-TC lo fue en 9 de 11 pacientes (S 100%, VPP 81%). Al considerar en conjunto la TC y el PET-TC, la sensibilidad fue de 100% y el VPP de 82%.  Conclusiones:  en los resultados obtenidos se constata una subestimación de la CP en la imagenología a causa de las características de los nódulos y su patrón de captación. En el PET-TC, un SUV &gt; 6 podría aumentar la probabilidad diagnóstica de carcinomatosis. Esta breve serie de casos permite sugerir que TC y el 18FGD PET-TC deben ser solicitados y analizados en forma conjunta para incrementar su rendimiento, aunque la exploración quirúrgica continúa siendo el método más eficaz para el diagnóstico y evaluación de la CP.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Summary: Imagenology contributes to the accurate diagnosis of peritoneal compromise in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis, although its effectiveness is still limited. CT is the most frequently used study and PET/CT is graduallly more requested in the assessment of different neoplasms. This study aims to assess performance of CT and PET/CT for diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis in digestive and gynecological tumours.  Method: retrospective, observational study of 11 cases operated on peritoneal carcinomatosis after a CT and/or PET/CT had been performed. The results of both image studies were analysed separately and altogether and they were subsequently compared to intraoperative and pathology studies.  Results:  CT matched findings in 8 out of 10 cases (sensitivity 78%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 33%), whereas PET/TC matched in 9 out of 11 patients (sensitivity 100%, PPV 81%). When considered together, sensitivity was 100% y el PPV de 82%.  Conclusions:  the results of the study confirm imagenology studies overestimate peritoneal carcinomatosis based on the characteristics of nodules and its uptake pattern. In CT/PET, SUV&gt; 6 could increase the probability of diagnosing carcinomatosis. This small series of cases enables our suggesting CT and 18F-FDG PET-TC to be requested and analysed together to increase its efficiency, although surgical exploration continues to be the most effective method to diagnose and assess peritoneal carcinomatosis.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo: Na avaliação da carcinomatose peritoneal (CP) as técnicas de imagem contribuem ao diagnóstico preciso do compromisso peritoneal, embora sua eficácia ainda seja limitada. A tomografia computadorizada (TC) é o estudo de imagens mais utilizado e a tomografia computadorizada por emissão de pósitrons (PET-TC) é cada vez mais solicitado na avaliação de diferentes neoplasias. O objetivo do presente trabalho, é avaliar o rendimento da TC e do PET-TC no diagnóstico de CP em tumores digestivos e ginecológicos.  Material e método: estudo retrospectivo, observacional de 11 casos de carcinomatose peritoneal operados nos quais previamente se havia realizado TC e/ou PET-TC. Os resultados de ambos estudos foram estudados isoladamente e em conjunto e foram comparados com os achados intraoperatórios e histopatológicos.  Resultados:  a TC foi concordante em 8 de 10 casos (S 78%, E 100%, VPP 100%, VPN 33%), e o PET-TC em 9 de 11 pacientes (S 100%, VPP 81%). A sensibilidade foi de 100% e o VPP de 82% quando ambos estudos foram analisados conjuntamente.  Conclusoes: observa-se nos resultados uma subestimação da CP nas técnicas de imagem, devido às características dos nódulos e seu padrão de captação. No PET-TC, um SUV &gt; 6 poderia aumentar a probabilidade de diagnosticar carcinomatose. Esta breve série de casos permite sugerir que a TC e o 18FGD PET-TC devem ser solicitados e analisados em forma conjunta para aumentar o rendimento. No entanto a exploração cirúrgica continua sendo o método mais eficaz para o diagnóstico e avaliação da CP.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Neoplasias peritoneales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Carcinoma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Peritoneo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Hipertermia inducida]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Tomografía de emisión de positrones]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Tomografía computarizada por rayos X]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Peritoneal neoplasms]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Carcinoma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Peritoneum]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Hyperthermia, induced]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Positron-emission tomography]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Tomography, X-ray computed]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Neoplasias peritoneais]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Carcinoma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Peritônio]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Hipertermia induzida]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Tomografia por emissão de pósitrons]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Tomografia computadorizada por raios X]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verwaal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Ruth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Bree]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Slooten]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Tinteren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Clin Oncol]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>3737-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Glehen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kwiatkowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sugarbaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Simone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer a multi-institutional study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Clin Oncol]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>3284-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stephens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alderman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Edwards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esquivel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sebbag]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Morbidity and mortality analysis of 200 treatments with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraoperative intraoperitoneal chemotherapy using the coliseum technique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>790-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verwaal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Tinteren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zoetmulder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Toxicity of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>85</volume>
<page-range>61-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sugarbaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Early intervention for treatment and prevention of colorectal carcinomatosis a plan individualized care]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Surg Oncol Clin N Am]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>689-703</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis; a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Br J Radiol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<numero>1081</numero>
<issue>1081</issue>
<page-range>20170519</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turkmen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bakir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iyibozkurt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ozel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Has]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nucl Med Commun]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>509-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Bree]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koops]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kroger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Ruth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Witkamp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zoetmulder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Peritoneal carcinomatosis colorectal or appendiceal origin: correlation of preoperative CT with intraoperative findings and evaluation of interobserver agreement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>86</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>64-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jacquet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Felinek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sugarbaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cancer]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>1631-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turlakow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yeung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salmon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macapinlac]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Peritoneal carcinomatosis role of (18)F-FDG PET]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Nucl Med]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>1407-12</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suzuki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kawano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takahashi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nakagami]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miyagi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>1413-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tanaka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kawai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kanai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nakamoto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takabayashi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Usefulness of FDG-positron emission tomography in diagnosing peritoneal recurrence of colorectal cancer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Surg]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>184</volume>
<page-range>433-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nahmias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wahl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reproducibility of standardized uptake value measurements determined by 18F-FDG PET in malignant tumors]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Nucl Med]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>1804-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schillaci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Use of dual-point fluorodeoxyglucose imaging to enhance sensitivity and specificit]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Semin Nucl Med]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<page-range>267-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoogendam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer]]></article-title>
<collab>van de Wetering FT.Spijker R.Verleye L.Vlayen J</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Cochrane Database Syst Rev]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>CD012567</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bushati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rovers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sommariva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sugarbaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yonemura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The current practice of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases results of a worldwide web-based survey of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>1942-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dromain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leboulleux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Auperin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goere]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lumbroso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis enhanced CT vs. PET/TC]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Abdom Imaging]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>87-93</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berthelot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Girault]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verrièle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poirier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A-L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moroch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Use of FDG-PET/TC for peritoneal carcinomatosis before hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nucl Med Comm]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>23-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whiteford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whiteford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ogunbiyi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dehdashti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and the rectum]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dis Colon Rectum]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>767-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Higashi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ueda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yuasa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oguchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noguchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Nucl Med]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>1016-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rubini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Altini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Notaristefano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merenda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rubini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stabile Ianora]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Role of 18F-FDG PET/TC in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis in the restaging of patient with ovarian cancer as compared to contrast enhanced CT and tumor marker Ca-125]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>22-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Li]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jiang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of PET with PET/CT in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis a meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Abdom Imaging]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<page-range>2660-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schwenzer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schmidt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gatidis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brendle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Müller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Königsrainer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis comparison with 18F-FDG-PET]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Magn Reson Imaging]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1121-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
