SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29Sugarcane production and nutrient accumulation in commercial plantations under vinasse irrigationPhysiological response of Poncirus trifoliata rootstock to infection by an RB of Citrus tristeza virus isolate author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Related links

Share


Agrociencia Uruguay

On-line version ISSN 2730-5066

Agrocienc. Urug. vol.29  Montevideo  2025  Epub Dec 01, 2025

https://doi.org/10.31285/agro.29.1552 

Articles

Phytochemical study of the plant species Cestrum nocturnum L. (solanaceae) and Nerium oleander L. (apocynaceae)

Estudio fitoquímico de las especies de plantas Cestrum nocturnum L. (solanaceae) y Nerium oleander L. (apocynaceae)

Estudo fitoquímico das espécies de plantas Cestrum nocturnum L. (Solanaceae) e Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae)

1Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador, enrique.ruiz@utm.edu.ec


Abstract:

The use of medicinal plants species as an alternative to pharmaceutical medicines is a practice with great potential due to Ecuador's rich biodiversity. The study is justified by the lack of scientific evidence supporting the consolidation of herbal medicine within the Ecuadorian health system. The primary objective is to conduct a phytochemical study of extracts obtained from leaves of Cestrum nocturnum L. (Solanaceae) and Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae), two species with traditional medicinal use.

The methodology employed includes the collection of samples from the Botanical Garden of the Technical University of Manabí. The leaves were dried at temperatures of 40 and 50 °C, and the extracts were obtained using Soxhlet, maceration, and ultrasound methods. Chemical tests were conducted to identify the presence of phenols, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, catechins, and reducing sugars. Additionally, the antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated using the ABTS and DPPH methods.

The main results indicate that the maceration method produced the highest phenol content in Cestrum nocturnum L. (56.763 ± 1.583 mg GAE/g DS), while the Soxhlet method was more effective for Nerium oleander L. (60.334 ± 2.997 mg GAE/g DS). In terms of antioxidant capacity, Cestrum nocturnum L. showed higher values with 229.247 ± 7.259 μmol Trolox/g DS compared to Nerium oleander L.

The main conclusions suggest that Cestrum nocturnum L. has greater antioxidant potential, supporting its use in herbal medicine. This study provides a scientific basis for the integration of these plants into Ecuador's health system.

Keywords: phytochemistry; antioxidants; phenols; flavonoids; extraction

Resumen:

El uso de especies de plantas medicinales como alternativa a los medicamentos farmacéuticos es una práctica con gran potencial debido a la rica biodiversidad del Ecuador. El estudio se justifica por la falta de evidencia científica que respalde la consolidación de la fitoterapia dentro del sistema de salud ecuatoriano. El objetivo principal es realizar un estudio fitoquímico de extractos obtenidos de las hojas de Cestrum nocturnum L. (Solanaceae) y Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae), dos especies con usos medicinales tradicionales.

La metodología empleada incluye la recolección de muestras del Jardín Botánico de la Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Las hojas se secaron a temperaturas de 40 y 50 °C y los extractos se obtuvieron mediante los métodos Soxhlet, maceración y ultrasonido. Se realizaron pruebas químicas para identificar la presencia de fenoles, alcaloides, flavonoides, saponinas, catequinas y azúcares reductores. Adicionalmente, se evaluó la actividad antioxidante de los extractos mediante los métodos ABTS y DPPH.

Los principales resultados indican que el método de maceración produjo el mayor contenido de fenoles en Cestrum nocturnum L. (56,763 ± 1,583 mg GAE/g DS), mientras que el método Soxhlet fue más efectivo para Nerium oleander L. (60,334 ± 2,997 mg GAE/g DS). En términos de capacidad antioxidante, Cestrum nocturnum L. mostró valores superiores con 229,247 ± 7,259 μmol Trolox/g DS en comparación con Nerium oleander L.

Las principales conclusiones sugieren que Cestrum nocturnum L. tiene un mayor potencial antioxidante, lo que respalda su uso en la medicina herbal. Este estudio proporciona una base científica para la integración de estas plantas al sistema de salud del Ecuador.

Palabras clave: fitoquímica; antioxidantes; fenoles; flavonoides; extracción

Resumo:

O uso de espécies de plantas medicinais como alternativa aos medicamentos farmacêuticos, uma prática com grande potencial devido à rica biodiversidade do Equador. O estudo é justificado pela falta de evidências científicas que apoiem a consolidação da medicina herbal dentro do sistema de saúde equatoriano. O objetivo principal é realizar um estudo fitoquímico de extratos obtidos das folhas de Cestrum nocturnum L. (Solanaceae) e Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae), duas espécies com usos medicinais tradicionais.

A metodologia empregada inclui a coleta de amostras do Jardim Botânico da Universidade Técnica de Manabí. As folhas foram secas a temperaturas de 40 °C e 50 °C, e os extratos foram obtidos pelos métodos Soxhlet, maceração e ultrassom. Foram realizados testes químicos para identificar a presença de fenóis, alcaloides, flavonoides, saponinas, catequinas e açúcares redutores. Além disso, a atividade antioxidante dos extratos foi avaliada pelos métodos ABTS e DPPH.

Os principais resultados indicam que o método de maceração produziu o maior teor de fenol em Cestrum nocturnum L. (56,763 ± 1,583 mg GAE/g DS), enquanto o método Soxhlet foi mais eficaz para Nerium oleander L. (60,334 ± 2,997 mg GAE/g DS). Em termos de capacidade antioxidante, Cestrum nocturnum L. apresentou valores mais altos com 229,247 ± 7,259 μmol Trolox/g DS em comparação com Nerium oleander L.

As principais conclusões sugerem que Cestrum nocturnum L. tem maior potencial antioxidante, apoiando seu uso na medicina herbal. Este estudo fornece uma base científica para a integração dessas plantas no sistema de saúde do Equador.

Palavras-chave: fitoquímica; antioxidantes; fenóis; flavonoides; extração

1. Introduction

Ecuador is considered one of the richest countries in the world as regards diversity of plants and animals: it occupies sixth place worldwide in number of species and has 10% of all plant species on the planet in its territory. The Ecuadorian flora has been recognized and studied for a considerable amount of time, and the presence of more than 16,000 plant species has been documented1. The Ecuadorian territory occupies an area of 256,370 km 2(2) , in which about 20,000 species of vascular plants grow, 5,000 to 8,000 of which are medicinal3.

Medicinal plants have been employed to cure or alleviate diseases since ancient times, and their therapeutic use as a substitute for pharmaceutical medicines is now being considered4. However, sufficient scientific evidence for consolidating herbal medicine within health systems is not yet available5.

Research groups from the Technical University of Manabí (UTM) recently had two articles published related to the phytochemical study of plant species Zanthoxylum sprucei and Melampodium divaricatum6, and species Bidens pilosa L. and Croton floccosus7. Better conditions for the qualitative extraction of its metabolites were studied using maceration, ultrasonic bath, and soxhlet extraction techniques, as well as determination of their antioxidant capacity using the ABTS and DPPH methods.

Nerium oleander L. is an Ecuadorian species that provides medicinal properties directly related to the cardiovascular system and the heart8, although other biological activities have also been reported, such as antifungal9, antibacterial, insecticidal10, anti-inflammatory11, antimicrobial 12)(13) , antimalarial14, and antioxidant 15) activities. It is a large glabrous evergreen shrub with milky juice. The root is bitter, aphrodisiac, tonic good for chronic pain in the abdomen and pain in the joints. Leaves and roots of this plant have shown considerable antimicrobial and antibacterial properties. Moreover, Cestrum nocturnum L. has been reported to exhibit antibacterial16, antimicrobial17, and antioxidant activities18.

Einali and others19 reported the antioxidant activity using the DPPH radical, and the antimicrobial activity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Nerium oleander L leaves. These authors found a better response in the antioxidant and antimicrobial assays in the ethanolic extracts, which contained a higher concentration of phenols and flavonoids. The extracts were obtained by distillation for 24 h using water and ethanol as solvent.

The aim of this article is to present a detailed phytochemical analysis of the extracts obtained from the leaves of Cestrum nocturnum L. (Solanaceae) and Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae), cultivated in Manabí, to enrich and justify their medicinal use among the Ecuadorian population.

2. Materials and Methods

Fresh leaves of the species studied were collected, washed, and dried for analysis in the Botanical Garden at the Technical University of Manabí (UTM), Portoviejo, in the Manabí province, western Ecuador, in June 2021. The species Cestrum nocturnum L. is found at coordinates 1º2'19.30"S (latitude) and 80º27'37.40"W (longitude), while the coordinate axes of Nerium oleander L. are 1º2'15.30"S (latitude) and 80º27'43.00"W (longitude); 100 g of sample were taken from each species.

2.1 Drying and Extraction Process

The leaves were dried in an oven at 40 °C and 50 °C until their moisture content reached a range of 8-12%. Reduction was subsequently carried out in a sprayer in order to obtain greater uniformity 1-mm particle size.

The extracts were obtained using various extraction methods: Soxhlet, maceration, and ultrasound, using the same amount of plant material (10 g) for each one. The Soxhlet extractions were carried out using 225 mL of solvent ethanol and petroleum ether, and the maceration static for 72 hours and ultrasonic bath 50 w extractions were carried out using 100 mL of solvent. The mixtures were then passed through 125 mm filter paper to remove impurities, after which they were stored in amber-colored bottles at 4 ºC to prevent oxidation.

2.2 Phytochemical Screening

The extracts obtained by the Soxhlet method were used to determine the presence or absence of secondary metabolites. This is one of the most efficient extraction methods, with the highest percentage of yield7.

  • • Ferric chloride test (Phenols and/or Tannins)

  • • Wagner test (Alkaloids)

  • • Shinoda test (flavonoids)

  • • Foam Test (Saponins)

  • • Test for catechins (Catechins)

  • • Fehling test (reducing sugars)

2.3 Antioxidant Activity

2.3.1 ABTS Test

This is based on the quantification of the discoloration of the 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethyl benzo-thiazolin-6-sulfonate ammonium) radical (ABTS), as proposed by Rioja- Antezana and others20.

2.3.2 ABTS•+ Radical Method

The ABTS•+ radical was formed after the reaction of 3.5 mM ABTS with 1.25 mM potassium persulfate (final concentration). The samples were incubated at room temperature and in the dark for 16-24 h. Once the ABTS radical was formed, it was diluted with ethanol until obtaining an absorbance of 0.7± 0.05 at 734 nm.

The Trolox calibration curve y=-0.011x + 0.369 (R2) 0.996 is obtained according to the following dilutions (5, 10, 15, 20 and 25) µM. 1 mL of ABTS solution and 1 mL of the standards or samples are added. The solution is left to stand for 30 minutes at room temperature and in the dark. It is then measured with a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Genesys180) at a wavelength of 734 nm.

The results of the ABTS method are expressed in Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Activity (TEAC). This is calculated from the following expression21:

TEAC=(C*V)/m

Where:

C: concentration stabilized by the curve

V: Volume of the sample

m: Mass of the sample

2.3.3 DPPH Test

The antioxidant activity was determined using a spectrophotometer and the DPPH molecule as a reagent to generate the free radical following the methodology described by Ruiz-Reyes and others 6)(7) . DPPH reagent preparation: 0.02 g of the DPPH reagent was weighed out and made up to volume with 100 mL of methanol in a flask. This was then homogenized and left to react for 24 hours in an amber bottle in the dark.

2.3.4 Wavelength Determination

2.5 mL of the prepared DPPH reagent was taken and 15 mL ethanol added. A scan was carried out in the spectrophotometer.

A maximum absorbance of 0.750 _ 0.05 should appear at a wavelength of 517 nm.

2.4 Total Phenolic Content

The Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) method, which is based on the oxidation of phenolic compounds, is fast and easy to perform22.

2.4.1 Determination of Total Phenols

Determination of the total content of phenols in the extracts was carried out using the Follin-Ciocalteau reaction and by employing gallic acid as the reference phenolic compound. The gallic acid calibration curve was prepared by weighing 2 mg of gallic acid and making it up to a volume of 10 mL with distilled water, which is the stock solution at a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL. Aliquots of 50 μL were subsequently taken, after which 200 μL of Follin-Ciocalteau reagent and 2mL of 7% Na2CO3 were added, and the solution was made up to 5 mL. After the absence of light for 30 minutes and at room temperature, the absorbance at 725 nm was measured using the prepared solution as a blank without the analyte.

2.4.2 Total Flavonoid Content

This test was performed using the Aluminum Chloride reagent. The procedure employed was the following:

Total flavonoid content was determined using quercetin as standard. For the preparation of the quercetin standard, 2 mg of the quercetin standard was weighed and dissolved with 70% methanol in a 10 mL volumetric flask, which is considered the mother solution with a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL. The aluminum chloride solution was subsequently prepared by weighing 500 mg of AlCl3 and dissolving it with a solution of 25 mL 5% acetic acid in methanol, which led to a solution with a concentration of 20 mg/mL and aluminum chloride. In order to perform the calibration curve with the quercetin standard, aliquots of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 μL of the standard solution were taken and made up to 1 mL with methanol (70%), after which 1 mL of the AlCl3 solution was added. The same solution was used as a blank without adding the standard compound. After waiting 15 min for the reaction, the absorbance of the solution was measured at a wavelength of 430 nm in the UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The preparation of the extracts was carried out by taking 5 mg of the sample, which was dissolved in 5 mL of 70% aqueous methanol. The determination procedure for total flavonoids was carried out by taking 200 μL aliquots of different extracts of the sample in triplicate and making them up with 1 mL of methanol (70%), after which 1 mL of the AlCl3 solution was added. After waiting 15 min, the absorbance of the solution was measured at a wavelength of 430 nm in the UV-Vis Thermo Scientific Genesys 180 spectrophotometer. Both methodologies were described by Ruiz-Reyes and others 6)(7) , Tomás-Barberán and ohers23, and Camacho & Melgarejo24.

3. Results

3.1 Analysis of Extraction Processes (Yields) and Multiple Range Tests

A multifactorial statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with a maximum order of interaction of 2 for the yield values of both plants. The analysis of variance for the extraction yield of Cestrum nocturnum L. and Nerium oleander L. made it possible to determine that there was a statistically significant difference among the solvent factors and extraction methods.

Figure 1: ANOVA for the influence of factors on the extraction yield of Cestrum nocturnum L. 

Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows the influence of the factors of the experimental design on the extraction yield. Petroleum ether is the non-polar solvent we had in the laboratory and we wanted to compare the results of antioxidant activity and phenol and flavonoid content with the polar ethanol extracts. There is a notable decrease in yields when petroleum ether is used for the extraction process. The Soxhlet extraction process with ethanol obtained the best yield values for both cases when drying at 40-50 °C.

Figure 2: ANOVA for the influence of factors on the extraction yield of Nerium oleander L. 

3.2 Extraction Method

The best yield was obtained by applying Soxhlet extraction, since the differences between the yields obtained using the maceration and ultrasound methods were highly significant (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The Soxhlet extraction method made it possible to obtain a greater volume of samples, thus making it the most efficient technological procedure.

Figure 3: Multiple range ANOVA test for the extraction method, Cestrum nocturnum L. 

Figure 4: Multiple range ANOVA test for the extraction method, Nerium oleander L. 

3.4 Temperature

The results show that there are no significant differences between the operating temperatures employed in the process. With regard to species Cestrum nocturnum L. (Figure 5), it is observed that higher yields were obtained for the dry plant material at 50 °C in all the different extraction processes. A greater variation in yields was not, however, obtained for species Nerium oleander L. with respect to the temperature conditions used (Figure 6).

Figure 5: Multiple range ANOVA test for drying temperature, Cestrum nocturnum L. 

Figure 6: Multiple range ANOVA test for drying temperature, Nerium oleander L. 

Indeed, the higher the temperature, the faster dehydration occurred. The drying temperature is determined by the sensitivity of the active ingredients of the plant, signifying that there is an ideal drying temperature for each species25.

3.5 Solvents

In the case of species Cestrum nocturnum L. and Nerium oleander L., the extractions carried out with ethanol were more efficient than those carried out with petroleum ether (Figure 7 and Figure 8). A yield of 33.8% was attained for Cestrum nocturnum L. This was greater than that attained by Cruz Ymata & Zapata Miranda26, which was 25.5% when applying the same Soxhlet and solvent (ethanol) method to dry leaves from a plant of the Cestrum genus. This is related to the polarity of the solvents, since plant metabolites are more easily extracted by polar solvents.

Figure 7: Multiple range ANOVA test for the solvent, Cestrum nocturnum L. 

Figure 8: Multiple range ANOVA test for the solvent, Nerium oleander L. 

3.6 Data Obtained from Phytochemical Tests

Table 1 shows the qualitative results of the phytochemical screening carried out on the ethanolic extracts when employing the Soxhlet extraction method at 40-50 °C. An abundance of phenols, flavonoids, and saponins was obtained for both species. With regard to Cestrum nocturnum L., a moderate presence of alkaloids, catechins was detected. A greater abundance of reducing sugars was obtained when extracted at 50 °C. The species Nerium oleander L. had an abundance of reducing sugars and catechins, and a moderate presence of alkaloids. These results coincide with those of other authors, who have attained similar values as regards the content of secondary metabolites27.

Table 1: Results of the phytochemical tests for the ethanolic extracts of Cestrum nocturnum L. and Nerium oleander L. obtained with the soxhlet method at 40 ºC and 50 ºC 

3.7 Total Content of Phenols and Flavonoids

The mg Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE) per gram of dry sample (DS) were obtained for Cestrum nocturnum L. and Nerium oleander L species. The ethanolic extracts contained the highest concentrations for both plants, with the maceration extraction method obtaining the highest content of total phenols (56.763 ± 1.583 mg GAE/g DS) for the first species and the Soxhlet extraction method obtaining the highest content of total phenols (60.334 ± 2.997 mg GAE/g DS) for the second one.

Figure 9: Phenolic content of the ethanolic extracts and petroleum ether of (a) Cestrum nocturnum L. and (b) Nerium oleander L. 

Figure 9 (a) shows the results obtained for Cestrum nocturnum L. species. The content of total phenolic compounds for the ethanolic extracts varies between 38.034 ± 1.279 and 56.763 ± 1.583 mg GAE/g DS, while for the extracts of petroleum ether the phenolic content varies between 4.245 ± 0.854 and 34.558 ± 1.815 mg GAE/g DS.

Figure 9 (b) shows the content of total phenolic compounds for the ethanolic extracts of Nerium oleander L. species. This varies between 34.954 ± 0.764 and 60.334 ± 2.997 mg GAE/g DS. A similar study highlighted that the total phenolic content of the Nerium oleander L. leaf is 12.626 g GAE per 100 g dry extract (DE), and this result was obtained for a methanolic extract28. Another piece of research states that the ethanol content of oleander leaves is 43.88 ± 0.49 mg GAE/ g DS, a value similar to the results obtained in this study19.

3.8 Total Flavonoid Test Content

The results of the flavonoid content are presented in mg Quercetin Equivalent (QE) in grams of DS for Cestrum nocturnum L. and Nerium oleander L. The ethanolic extracts have a larger amount of flavonoids when compared to those of petroleum ether at 40 and 50 °C. This is explained by the polarity, since it is known that flavonoids are polar metabolites and that their extraction is easily carried out when extracted with high polarity solvents such as ethanol29. Moreover, the solvents most frequently used for the determination of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity by means of the DPPH method are methanol and ethanol30.

In the case of Cestrum nocturnum L., the extractions carried out by employing maceration and ultrasound contained the highest concentrations under both temperature conditions (40 °C), 70.330 ± 6.227 mg QE/g DS, as observed in Figure 10 (a). Species from the same family (Solanaceae) have yielded data of 148.52 ± 0.1 mg g-1 DS as regards the content of total flavonoids31. In another publication, values from 7.8 ± 0.3 to 13.3 ± 0.3 mg g-1 were reported, both with methanolic extracts32.

The values of the ethanolic extracts for Nerium oleander L. species are very similar, and as shown in Figure 10(b), they vary from 17.765 ± 0.541 to 23.028 ± 0.696 mg QE/g DS, although those obtained by means of maceration stand out: 23.028 ± 0.696 mg g-1 at 40 °C and 21.027 ± 0.389 mg g-1 at 50 °C. In another study, a value of 16.55 ± 0.82 mg QE/g DS was identified, which shows that the results obtained in this research are higher19.

Figure 10: Flavonoid content of ethanolic extracts and petroleum ether of (a) Cestrum nocturnum L. and (b) Nerium oleander L. 

3.9 Antioxidant Capacity (DPPH)

Figure 11 (a) and Table 5 of the Supplementary Material show that the concentration range for Cestrum nocturnum L. species varies between 15.327 ± 0.038 and 22.207 ± 2.114 µmol Trolox eq. /g DS for the ethanolic extracts and 3.536 ± 0.551 and 29.157 ± 3.466 for the petroleum ether extracts. When comparing the results of the antioxidant activity of Cestrum auriculatum L. (93.29 µmol equivalent to Trolox/ g DS)26, it is possible to state that they may be lower, depending on the study conditions. Godos presented the result of the in vitro antioxidant activity for this same genus, but with methanol as a solvent (190.57 ± 49.04 mM trolox eq. /g DS)32.

Figure 11 (b) and Table 6 of the Supplementary Material show the established range of antioxidant activity, which varies from 40.350 ± 3.001 to 55.366 ± 1.375 µmol Trolox eq. /g DS for ethanolic extracts, and obtains a better concentration with the Soxhlet method at 50 °C. In a medicinal study carried out by Balkan and others33, the antioxidant activity results of 71.38 ± 0.23 nmol Trolox /mg of ethanolic extract and 2.65 ± 0.01 nmol trolox / mg of hexane extract are detailed for Nerium oleander L. flowers.

Figure 11: DPPH antioxidant activity of the ethanolic extracts and petroleum ether of (a) Cestrum nocturnum L. and (b)Nerium oleander L. 

3.10 Antioxidant Capacity (ABTS)

Figure 12 (a) and Table 3 of the Supplementary Material show the results obtained for the ethanolic extracts and petroleum ether. The concentration ranges vary from 188.167 ± 5.238 to 229.247 ± 7.259 and 6.363 ± 0.581 to 42.279 ± 4.211 µmol equi. Trolox/g-1 DS, respectively. The method that attained the highest concentration was ultrasonic bath. The results obtained in the ethanolic extracts are superior to those reported in Tovar del Río34, in which the antioxidant capacity of methanolic extracts was analyzed for several species belonging to the same family (Solanaceae), and the antioxidant activity was higher than that of certain fruits, the results for which varied from 2 ± 0.1 to 67.6 ± 0.4 µmol equi. Trolox/g-1 DS.

Figure 12 (b) and Table 4 of the Supplementary Material show the values of the ethanolic extracts of the Nerium oleander L. plant; the concentration varies from 170.507 ± 8.953 to 216.047 ± 4.749 µmol equi. Trolox /g DS, and the extractions carried out with the Soxhlet method reflect the highest amount of antioxidant activity at 40 °C. In the case of the petroleum ether extracts, the concentration ranges vary from 0.176 ± 0.087 to 2.520 ± 0.394 μmol TEAC/g-1. If these results are compared with those obtained for species from the same family (Apocynaceae), it is possible to state that better results were obtained using the ethanolic extracts34.

Figure 12: ABTS antioxidant activity of ethanolic extracts and petroleum ether of (a) Cestrum nocturnum L. and (b) Nerium oleander L. (b) 

4. Discussion

Table 2 shows the phenolic and flavonoid contents and the trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity of the species studied by our working group 6)(7) .

Table 2: Comparison of the content of phenols, flavonoids, and the antioxidant capacity of the plants studied 

Studied species in the Manabí province in western Ecuador Phenolic content (mg GAE/ g DS) Total flavonoid content (mg QE/ g DS) Antioxidant activity equivalent to Trolox (μmol equivalent trolox/ g DS)
Melampodium divaricatum 457.63 79.06 121.677*
Zanthoxylum sprucei 493.77 59.32 73.431*
Bidens pilosa L. 48.609 17.795 239.33
Croton floccosus 128.212 34.139 644.125
Cestrum nocturnum L. 56.763 70.330 229.247
Nerium oleander L. 60.334 23.028 216.047

*Antioxidant capacity of the DPPH radical IC50 (µg/mL)

It allows us to make a comparison of the results for the leaves of the six plants studied in ethanolic extract. It is important to highlight whether all reported results were obtained under the same experimental conditions. The leaves of the Zanthoxylum sprucei species have a higher phenolic content of 493.77 mg GAE/g DS and the leaves of the Bidens pilosa L. species have the lowest content of 48.609 mg GAE/g DS. Furthermore, the leaves of the species Melampodium divaricatum show the highest content of flavonoids 79.06 mg QE/ g DS, while the species Bidens pilosa L. have the lowest content of flavonoids 17.795 mg QE/ g DS. Although the DPPH radical IC50 (µg/mL) was used to measure the antioxidant capacity of the species Melampodium divaricatum and Zanthoxylum sprucei, we can say that the values obtained correspond to those reported in the literature 35)(36) .

We can also conclude that Cestrum nocturnum L. species presented the best Trolox equivalent response with 229.047 μmol trolox equivalent/g DS. Studies of antioxidant capacity by DPPH and GC-MS for the same species report that the polar fraction of the extract presents the compounds L-arabinitol (22.85%), trans-Z-a-bisabolene epoxide (17.04%), isoeugenol (8.21%), diosgenin (4.64%), 3-tetradecynoic acid (4.63%), D-mannitol (3.89%), and methoxyeugenol (3.44%) influencing the response37. Finally, we observed that there is a relationship between the phenolic and flavonoid content and the antioxidant capacity of the species studied, similar to what is reported by other authors for these species 38)(39) 40. This comparative evaluation serves as a foundation for selecting the most promising species for further clinical investigations. The data presented here provide insights into the bioactive potential of these plants, facilitating the design of targeted antioxidant applications.

5. Conclusions

The use of phytochemical tests to identify secondary metabolites shows that the plants studied have a series of chemical compounds that contain tannins/phenols, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, catechins, and reducing sugars in the case of both species. The best results for the content of total phenols were obtained for the Nerium oleander L. species when employing the ethanolic extracts, with the best yield obtained using Soxhlet extraction with plant material at 50 °C (60.334 ± 2.997 mg GAE/ g DS). The maceration extraction method proved to be ideal for the quantification of the content of total flavonoids (23.028 ± 0.696 mg QE/ g of DS at 40 °C). The best phenolic content results were obtained for the Cestrum nocturnum L. species when employing extraction by maceration method, with a value of 56,763 ± 1,583 mg GAE/g of DS. The highest concentration of content of flavonoids (70.330±6.227 mg QE/g of DS) was obtained when using extraction by maceration, both methods at 40 °C. Finally, with regard to antioxidant activity, it was shown that Cestrum nocturnum L. species had a better inhibitory power, with a value of 229.247 ± 7.259 μmol equivalent to Trolox /g DS, when compared to Nerium oleander L. (216.047 ± 4.749 μmol equivalent to Trolox/g DS).

Furthermore, comparisons with other species, such as Bidens pilosa L. and Zanthoxylum sprucei, highlight the diverse pharmacological value within Ecuador’s native flora. These findings directly contribute to the integration of medicinal plants into Ecuador’s healthcare system by providing robust scientific evidence of their bioactive properties. By identifying species with high antioxidant capacities and optimizing extraction techniques, this study paves the way for the development of standardized phytotherapeutic products. This integration not only promotes the sustainable use of Ecuador’s rich biodiversity but also aligns with global trends towards incorporating traditional medicine into formal healthcare practices. Ultimately, the results of this research strengthen the foundation for clinical and bioequivalence studies, fostering a more inclusive and sustainable healthcare model that leverages the medicinal potential of Ecuadorian plants.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Universidad Técnica de Manabí (UTM) by means of the Convocation Project approved in 2018 with the “Tamizaje fitoquímico y determinación de la actividad anti-oxidante y antibacterial de 8 familias de plantas medicinales que se encuentran en la provincia de Manabí”.

References

1. Cáceres Flores RD. Flora nativa del parque Metropolitano Itchimbía en el proyecto integrador con los estudiantes de décimo año de Educación General Básica de la Unidad Educativa Santiago de Guayaquil, año lectivo 2017-2018 - Distrito Metropolitano de Quito (bachelor's thesis). Quito (EC): Universidad Central del Ecuador, Facultad de Filosofía, Letras y Ciencias de la Educación; 2018. 113p. [ Links ]

2. Mejía E, Pacheco P. Aprovechamiento forestal y mercados de la madera en la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Bogor: CIFOR; 2013. 97p. [ Links ]

3. López-Tobar R, Baque R, Solano E, Belezaca C, Neill D, Torres B. Ecuaciones alométricas para estimar tasas de crecimiento de Myroxylon balsamum, Minquartia guianensis y Otoba parvifolia en la Amazonía ecuatoriana. Ciencia y Tecnología. 2018;11(1):11-8. [ Links ]

4. Jiménez González A, Mora Zamora KJ, Rosete Blandariz S, Cabrera Verdesoto CA. Utilización de plantas medicinales en cuatro localidades de la zona sur de Manabí, Ecuador. Siembra. 2021;8(2):e3223. Doi: 10.29166/siembra.v8i2.3223. [ Links ]

5. Gallegos-Zurita M, editor. Las plantas medicinales: principal alternativa para el cuidado de la salud, en la población rural de Babahoyo, Ecuador. An Fac Med. 2016;77:327-32. [ Links ]

6. Ruiz-Reyes E, Moreira-Castro J, Pin-Molina J, Pita-Marisol Y, Alcívar-Cedeño U. Phytochemical study of the plant species Zanthoxylum sprucei (Rutaceae) and Melampodium divaricatum (Asteraceae). PharmacologyOnline (Internet). 2021 (cited 2025 Mar 19);1:322-35. Available from: Available from: https://pharmacologyonline.silae.it/files/archives/2021/vol1/PhOL_2021_1_A040_Ruiz-Reyes.pdfLinks ]

7. Ruiz-Reyes E, Mendoza-Cevallos MA, Polanco-Moreira AP, Segovia-Cedeño DG, Alcivar-Cedeño UE, Dueñas-Rivadeneira A. Phytochemical study of the plant species Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae) and Croton floccosus (Euphorbiaceae). F1000Res. 2022;11:702. Doi: 10.12688/f1000research.112653.2. [ Links ]

8. Ibrahim A, Khalifa S, Khafagi I, Youssef D, Khan I, Mesbah M. Enhancement of oleandrin production in suspension cultures of Nerium oleander by combined optimization of medium composition and substrate feeding. Plant Biosyst. 2009;143(1):97-103. Doi: 10.1080/11263500802633683. [ Links ]

9. Jangid R, Begum T. Antimycotic activity of some medicinal plants against mucor circinelloides. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:3523920. Doi: 10.1155/2022/3523920. [ Links ]

10. Zaid R, Canela-Garayoa R, Ortega-Chacón NM, Mouhouche F. Phytochemical analyses and toxicity of Nerium oleander (Apocynaceae) leaf extracts against Chaitophorus leucomelas Koch, 1854 (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2022;21(5):310-7. Doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2021.10.011. [ Links ]

11. Shafiq Y, Naqvi SBS, Rizwani GH, Asghar MA, Bushra R, Ghayas S, Rehman AA, Asghar MA. A mechanistic study on the inhibition of bacterial growth and inflammation by Nerium oleander extract with comprehensive in vivo safety profile. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21(1):135. Doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03308-z. [ Links ]

12. Samarrai GFA, Khaleel RI, editors. Activity of some natural products and their toxicity in controlling Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;928:062018. Doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/928/6/062018. [ Links ]

13. Suleiman WB. In vitro estimation of superfluid critical extracts of some plants for their antimicrobial potential, phytochemistry, and GC-MS analyses. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020;19(1):29. Doi: 10.1186/s12941-020-00371-1. [ Links ]

14. Fakoorziba MR, Moemenbellah-Fard MD, Azizi K, Mokhtari F. Mosquitocidal efficacy of medicinal plant, Nerium oleander (Apocynaceae), leaf and flower extracts against malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2015;5(1):33-7. Doi: 10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60623-X. [ Links ]

15. Alurappa R, Bojegowda MR, Kumar V, Mallesh NK, Chowdappa S. Characterisation and bioactivity of oosporein produced by endophytic fungus Cochliobolus kusanoi isolated from Nerium oleander L. Nat Prod Res. 2014;28(23):2217-20. Doi: 10.1080/14786419.2014.924933. [ Links ]

16. Keshari AK, Srivastava R, Singh P, Yadav VB, Nath G. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by Cestrum nocturnum. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020;11(1):37-44. Doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.11.003. [ Links ]

17. Haggag MI. Phytochemical profile for Cestrum nocturnum leaves ethanolic extract and isolation of a rare flavonoid using different chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques. J Med Plants Stud. 2022;10:143-50. Doi: 10.22271/plants.2022.v10.i2b.1403. [ Links ]

18. Ahmad S, Alrouji M, Alhajlah S, Alomeir O, Pandey RP, Ashraf MS, Ahmad S, Khan S. Secondary metabolite profiling, antioxidant, antidiabetic and neuroprotective activity of Cestrum nocturnum (Night Scented-Jasmine): use of in vitro and in silico approach in determining the potential bioactive compound. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(6):1206. Doi: 10.3390/plants12061206. [ Links ]

19. Einali A, Azizian-Shermeh O, Ghasemi A. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activities of Periploca aphylla Decne, Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) and oleander (Nerium indicum Mill.) leaf extracts. J Food Meas Charact. 2018;12:1350-9. Doi: 10.1007/s11694-018-9749-9. [ Links ]

20. Rioja Antezana AP, Vizaluque BE, Aliaga-Rossel E, Tejeda L, Book O, Mollinedo P, Peñarrieta JM. Determinación de la capacidad antioxidante total, fenoles totales, y la actividad enzimática en una bebida no láctea en base a granos de chenopodium quinoa. Rev Boliv Quim. 2018;35(5):168-76. [ Links ]

21. Quispe Solano MA, Corilla Flores DD, Asto Hinojosa R, Huaman De La Cruz A, Manyari Cervantes GM. Capacidad antioxidante de aceite esencial de hojas de eucalipto (Eucalyptus globulus) extraído por energía ultrasónica. Journal of Agri-food Science. 2022;1(1):19-29. [ Links ]

22. Rover MR, Brown RC. Quantification of total phenols in bio-oil using the Folin-Ciocalteu method. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2013;104:366-71. Doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.06.011. [ Links ]

23. Tomás-Barberán FA, Gil MI, Cremin P, Waterhouse AL, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA. HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(10):4748-60. Doi: 10.1021/jf0104681. [ Links ]

24. Camacho O, Melgarejo S. Actividad antioxidante del extracto etanólico e hidroalcohólico y determinación química de los componentes mayoritarios del fruto de Eugenia jambolana (Uva venezolana) (bachelor’s thesis). Barranquilla (CO): Universidad del Atlántico; 2017. 130p. [ Links ]

25. Velásquez-Santos CO, Uribe-Gómez JA. Efecto de la temperatura y velocidad del aire sobre la humedad final de tomillo (Thymus vulgaris). Rev Bio Agro. 2019;17(1):34-44. Doi: 10.18684/bsaa.v17n1.1202. [ Links ]

26. Cruz Ymata LP, Zapata Miranda E. Evaluación de la actividad antioxidante, antibacteriana y antifúngica “in vitro” del extracto alcoholico de cestrum auriculatum l'hér.“Hierba Santa” en Bacterias Patógenas Grampositivas, Gramnegativas y Hongos 2016 (bachelor’s thesis). Arequipa (PE): Universidad Católica de Santa María, Facultad de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Bioquímicas y Biotecnológicas; 2017. 168p. [ Links ]

27. Kiran C, Prasad D. A review on: Nerium oleander Linn. (Kaner). Int J Pharmacogn Pharm Res. 2014;6(3):593-7. [ Links ]

28. Ayouaz S, Oliveira-Alves SC, Serra AT, Lefsih K, Samah M, Bento da Silva A, Madani K, Bronze MR. LC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS analysis and cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of chlorogenic acid derivative rich extract from Nerium oleander L. pink flowers. Food Funct. 2021;12(8):3624-34. Doi: 10.1039/d0fo02640a. [ Links ]

29. Rodríguez-Riera Z, Robaina-Mesa M, Jáuregui-Haza U, Blanco-González A, Rodríguez-Chanfrau JE. Empleo de la radiación ultrasónica para la extracción de compuestos bioactivos provenientes de fuentes naturales: estado actual y perspectivas. Rev CENIC Cienc Quím. 2014;45(1):139-47. [ Links ]

30. Barrientos Ramírez L, Arvizu ML, Salcedo Pérez E, Villanueva Rodríguez S, Vargas Radillo JJ, Barradas Reyes BA, Ruiz López MA. Polyphenols content and antioxidant capability of wild and under cultivation Physalis chenopodifolia Lam. Rev Mex Cienc Forestales. 2019;10(51):182-200. [ Links ]

31. Fernández-Rodríguez VE, Ruiz-López MA. Contenido de polifenoles, capacidad antioxidante y toxicidad de Solanum ferrugineum (solanaceae) con potencial medicinal. Acta Biol Colomb. 2021;26(3):414-22. Doi: 10.15446/abc.v26n3.87032. [ Links ]

32. Godos Chinchayhuara YY. Actividad antioxidante y contenido de polifenoles en hojas de Cestrum auriculatum L’Her (hierba santa) (bachelor’s thesis). Chimbote (PE): Universidad Católica los Ángeles de Chimbote, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud; 2018. 39p. [ Links ]

33. Balkan IA, Doğan HT, Zengin G, Colak N, Ayaz FA, Gören AC, Kırmızıbekmez H, Yeşilada E. Enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant activities of Nerium oleander L. flower extracts and activity guided isolation of the active components. Ind Crop Prod. 2018;112:24-31. Doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.058. [ Links ]

34. Tovar del Río J. Determinación de la actividad antioxidante por DPPH y ABTS de 30 plantas recolectadas en la ecoregion cafetera (bachelor’s thesis). Pereira (CO): Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Facultad de Tecnología; 2013. 133p. [ Links ]

35. Nogueira ME, Passoni MH, Biso FI, Longo Mdo C, Cardoso CR, Santos LC, Varanda EA. Investigation of genotoxic and antigenotoxic activities of Melampodium divaricatum in Salmonella typhimurium. Toxicol In Vitro. 2006;20(3):361-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.08.012. [ Links ]

36. Negi J, Bisht V, Bhandari A, Bisht R, Negi SK. Major constituents, antioxidant and tibacterialctivities of Zanthoxylum armatum DC. Essential Oil. IJPT. 2012;11:68-72. [ Links ]

37. Al-Reza SM, Rahman A, Cho Y-S, Kang SC. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil and organic extracts of Cestrum nocturnum L. J Essent Oil-Bear Plants. 2010;13(5):615-24. Doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2010.10643871. [ Links ]

38. Subhadra Devi V, Umamaheswari M, KarthikNooney J, JavvajiNeeraja JB, Mohan KP. Investigation of in vitro antioxidant activities of Nerium Oleander. IJMPS. 2012;2(1):1-5. [ Links ]

39. Mohadjerani M. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Nerium oleander L. grown in North of Iran. Iran J Pharm Res. 2012;11(4):1121-6. [ Links ]

40. Rashed KNZ. Investigation of antioxidant activity from Cestrum nocturnum L. stems and phytochemical content. Reviews of Progress. 2013;1(5):1-6. [ Links ]

Transparency of data The entire data set that supports the results of this study was published in the article itself and in the Supplementary Materials.

Author contribution statement AGZV: Formal Analysis, Research, Writing - Preparation of Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Software. JDBM: Formal Analysis, Research, Writing - Preparation of Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Software. DGSC: Conceptualization, Research, Software, Writing - Preparation of Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. JMMC: Taxonomy selection of study plants, Writing - Review & Editing. ERR: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Acquisition of Funding, Research, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing - Preparation of Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing.

Editor The following editor approved this article: Caterina Rufo (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-8818) Universidad de la República, Canelones, Uruguay.

S1. Antioxidant Activity ABTS

Table 3: Antioxidant activity equivalent to Trolox for ethanolic extracts of Cestrum nocturnum 

Table 4: Antioxidant activity equivalent to Trolox for ethanolic extracts of Nerium oleander 

S2. Antioxidant Activity DPPH

Table 5: Antioxidant activity equivalent to Trolox for ethanolic extracts of Cestrum nocturnum 

Table 6: Antioxidant activity equivalent to Trolox for ethanolic extracts of Nerium oleander 

Received: September 19, 2024; Accepted: February 24, 2025

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License