SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número37Covid-19 y la odontología latinoamericana para pacientes con necesidades especialesResultados de las técnicas blanqueadoras mixta e inmediata para el blanqueamiento de dientes tratados endodónticamente - reportes de casos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Links relacionados

Compartir


Odontoestomatología

versión impresa ISSN 0797-0374versión On-line ISSN 1688-9339

Odontoestomatología vol.23 no.37 Montevideo  2021  Epub 30-Abr-2021

http://dx.doi.org/10.22592/ode2021n37a7 

Case report

Syphilis: the great imitator. A case report and literature review

Yadira V. Boza Oreamuno1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-8664

Sandra M. Boza Oreamuno2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6623-4924

1Departamento de Ciencias Diagnósticas y Quirúrgicas, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica

2Departamento de Análisis Clínicos, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica. sandra.boza@ucr.ac.cr

Abstract

Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease caused by Treponema pallidum. Without treatment, it is chronic and highly contagious. Its varied clinical manifestations make it challenging to diagnose. We present the case of a syphilis oral lesion with a strong clinical suggestion of squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinical case:

a 31-year-old man with a large ulcer in the right lower lip mucosa with indurated edges, two months of evolution, associated with two enlarged neck lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy). A thorough history is taken, and laboratory tests are run, confirming the treponemal infection diagnosis. He was treated, and the injury resolved. Follow-up tests were nonreactive.

Conclusions

. It is important to suspect a syphilitic infection when a patient has lymphadenopathy and an oral lesion. Making the correct diagnosis allows for the proper care and recovery, avoiding complications that affect the patient’s quality of life and sexual partners.

Keywords: syphilis; oral cavity; sexually transmitted diseases; Treponema pallidum

Introduction

Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by a bacterium called Treponema pallidum, whose only natural host is humans 1-2. Its main site of inoculation is the genital organs. However, new sexual practices have caused this bacterium to have tropism for the oral cavity and anal region 3-5. Mother to fetus transmission may also occur during pregnancy or childbirth 6,7. There is a high risk of infection when sharing syringes for drug use 8. Few cases of blood transfusion transmission have been reported 1,8.

The World Health Organization (WHO) considers syphilis a global public health problem as it is one of the eight most prevalent STDs 7.

Most people do not even realize they have syphilis as the onset of symptoms is highly variable, and the disease develops over prolonged latency periods. This leads to the spread of the disease, making it essential to diagnose and treat it 9.

Untreated syphilis is a chronic disease 10,11. The treatment of choice is penicillin G benzathine. Treatment dosage and duration depend on the stage of the disease and the patient’s clinical manifestations 5,10.

This paper aims to present the case of a syphilis oral lesion with a strong clinical suggestion of squamous cell carcinoma. It also seeks to demonstrate the importance of an accurate and quick diagnosis. This increases the effectiveness of the treatment strategy for patients and their sexual partners, which prevents further infections.

Background

Symptoms vary at different stages: primary syphilis usually manifests as a single ulcer (chancre) at the site of inoculation. This usually occurs between 9 and 90 days after the incubation period, and it takes approximately 3 weeks to spontaneously disappear, although periods of up to 8 weeks have been reported 3,5,12. The chancre is painless, highly contagious, and can go unnoticed 5,13.

If left untreated, the disease progresses to the secondary stage that can cause a rash in different parts of the body between 2 and 12 weeks after the chancre disappears (in some cases, it remains) 1,14. Erythema on the palms and soles is highly suggestive of secondary syphilis 5,13. Besides, a variety of mouth lesions may appear, which are more common at this stage than at the primary stage 3.

Syphilis has been called “the great imitator” because of its many possible symptoms that resemble those of other diseases 15. Oral mucosal lesions are quite variable and similar to pathologies such as lichen planus, eosinophilic ulcer, lymphoma, necrotizing sialometaplasia, and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) 16.

Tertiary syphilis manifests as perforating ulcers called syphilitic gummas that can lead to neurosyphilis or cardiovascular syphilis 11,14.

The infection may have latency periods (no symptoms and/or signs) between the secondary and tertiary stages, when it can only be detected with a serological test 17.

Case description

A 31-year-old Nicaraguan male deprived of liberty is brought to the School of Dentistry of the University of Costa Rica (UCR) with the main complaint of lower lip injury of approximately two months of evolution. He does not report a history or systemic contraindications in the direct interview. He currently does not take any medications. He states that he is a chronic smoker: 30 cigarettes a day from the age of 16. When asked about his sexual activity, he reports being single, bisexual, and having had unprotected oral sex with males.

Dry and cracked lower lip vermilion border was observed during the clinical examination. A 3 x 4 cm ulcer appears at the lower right lip mucosa. It has very hardened edges associated with erosive areas. The base is covered with a yellowish pseudomembrane that is painful to palpation and when brushing against the teeth. The patient reports a smaller lesion at first, which he thought was a bite or injury. But the lesion did not heal and instead grew in two months (Fig. 1A). He had two enlarged lymph nodes measuring 2 cm on the neck, on the right level III. They were ovoid and painful on palpation, with an evolution of two days. No facial or skin contour alterations were observed (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1: A. Ulcer on the right lower lip mucosa, 3 x 4 cm, hardened edges associated with erosive areas and the base covered with yellowish pseudomembrane. B. Two 2 cm enlarged lymph nodes, ovoid in shape, at level III of the right side of the neck 

Given the findings, OSCC vs. syphilitic chancre were established as clinical diagnosis. An ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was taken from the neck, and laboratory tests were run: complete blood count, VDRL (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

The neck ultrasound detected two enlarged lymph nodes at level III. They measured 22 mm and 18 mm, had no hilum, and the FNAB was negative for malignant cells and compatible with reactive adenopathy. The HIV test was negative; VDRL was positive. The fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test was performed, and the result was positive.

With the definitive diagnosis of syphilis, he was referred to the Costa Rican Social Security Fund. He was treated with penicillin 2.4 million unit, intramuscular injection every eight days for three weeks. He was told to ask his sexual partners to take blood tests to rule out syphilis.

The lesion healed within one week of treatment (Figure 2). Follow-up was performed with negative VDRL blood test at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. He reported oral functionality and comfort and is lesion-free.

Fig. 2: The check-up eight days after starting the treatment already shows healing in the area 

The patient provided his free and informed written consent for the publication of his case.

Discussion

According to the WHO, the rate of reported syphilis cases has increased worldwide 9 according to the WHO, with an estimated 5.6 million new cases each year 18. In our country, the people most affected are in the 20-65 age range. It is more prevalent among men 19.

At-risk populations include men who have sex with other men, sex workers and their clients, people who have numerous sexual partners, transgender people, or those who already have an STD 7,20,21. There are also vulnerable populations, such as adolescents, children, and young people living on the streets, prisoners, and drug users 7. This coincides with our case: the patient was a man, deprived of liberty, and has sex with men and women.

Treponema pallidum enters the mucosa or eroded skin and starts dividing at the site of inoculation, producing primary syphilis 5. The primary lesion appears after an incubation period of 21 days on average (range between 9 and 90 days) 11. It is a hardened and painless chancre, with a clean base, firm and raised edges, and rich in treponemas. It is usually accompanied by local 1 or regional lymphadenopathy 13. In this case, the syphilitic chancre was located in the lower lip mucosa, so the inoculation was due to oral sex. The patient was asymptomatic but had non suppurative neck adenopathy.

This case was similar to OSCC in appearance. OSCC is cancer more widely associated with men: it has been reported that over 90% of patients with oral cancer have been smokers 22. In advanced stages, it can present as a large tumor with or without ulcerations, a deep ulcer with an irregular vegetating surface raised edges, and a hard infiltration of oral tissues; prone to rapid spread to the lymphoid nodes and metastasis 23. The above is consistent with the case under study: clinically high suspicion of OSCC. Therefore, the interviewer’s ability to make a differential diagnosis is of paramount importance.

Early diagnosis of syphilis requires details of sexual history and drug use, which people seldom provide voluntarily and easily 24. It is essential to conduct a thorough physical examination. The professional must know the clinical manifestations, which is as important as the laboratory tests used and their correct interpretation to diagnose syphilis 2.

The screening and non treponemal tests to run are RPR (Rapid Plasma Reagin) and VDRL. These tests are easy and quick to perform. They are valuable because they can distinguish between an active infection and a previous one. Their disadvantage is their low specificity at certain stages of the disease, which leads to false positives 6,11,17. Therefore, a confirmatory test is required-CMIA (chemiluminescence immunoassay), HTPA (Treponema pallidum hemagglutination) and APTP or FTA-ABS-because they detect antibodies, remain positive for life, and do not distinguish an active infection from a treated one. This is why they must be run together with a presumptive test (6,17). VDRL and FTA-ABS were the diagnostic tests for syphilis used in this case.

It is recommended that men who have sex with other men be tested annually. If there are more associated risk factors, such as numerous partners or sex combined with illicit drugs, they should be tested every three months 13,24.

A biopsy might be necessary because, clinically, the lesion can be confused with various oral pathologies such as oral tuberculosis, aphthous ulcerations, lymphomas, necrotizing sialometaplasia, OSCC, among others 16,25-27, in particular when the lesion is the only sign of the disease. The biopsy must show an inflammatory plasma cell infiltration to suggest the diagnosis, leading to the anti-treponemal immunohistochemistry test, where spirochetes can be observed to confirm the presence of syphilis 28,29. Furthermore, it is helpful to run a FNAB of the affected lymphoid nodes. In this case, it allowed us to rule out malignancy and confirm a reactive adenopathy, allowing us to reach the definitive diagnosis of syphilis in conjunction with serological tests.

Parenteral Penicillin G is the drug of choice at all stages of the disease since it has maximum efficacy and no resistance 10. The health professional must follow up on the treatment to observe the patient’s response and treat the patient’s sexual partners of the previous 90 days 20,30. If the contact with sexual partners took place over 90 days before, laboratory tests are suggested to confirm whether they are infected or not; if so, treatment should be provided 10,20,30. Both elements were addressed in our case.

Oral sex and illicit drug use have increased, especially among adolescents, and probably as a safe way to avoid pregnancy, without worrying or having the correct information about the risks and consequences of highly infectious oral injuries caused by STDs 4,11,24,31.

The WHO has a global strategy (2016-2021) to reduce STDs and STD-related deaths drastically 7. The 2030 target is to reduce the global incidence of syphilis by 90% 32. This requires each country to define the specific populations that are most affected and have political support and resources to promote sustainable actions 7,33.

This case report is essential because syphilis was diagnosed early. It is also a clear example that teamwork with other health specialists is essential.

Conclusions

It is of the utmost importance for health professionals, especially dentists, to become familiar with this pathology. It is important to consider the suspicion of syphilitic infection when a patient has lymphadenopathy and an oral injury.

The quick diagnosis and correct treatment of this case allowed for the patient’s prompt care and recovery, as well as that of his sexual partners. This prevented more people from becoming infected and having their quality of life affected.

Expert advice can improve people’s ability to recognize STD symptoms, thus increasing their chances of seeking care or encouraging their sexual partners to do so.

REFERENCES

1. Cohen SE, Klausner JD, Engelman J, Philip S. Syphilis in the modern era: An update for physicians. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2013;27(4):705-22. [ Links ]

2. De Andrade RS, De Freitas EM, Rocha BA, Gusmão EDS, Filho MRM, Júnior HM. Oral findings in secondary syphilis. Med Oral Patol Oral y Cir Bucal. 2018;23(2):e138-43. [ Links ]

3. Ficarra G, Carlos R. Syphilis: The renaissance of an old disease with oral implications. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3(3):195-206. [ Links ]

4. Minicucci EM, Vieira RA, Oliveira DT, Marques SA. Oral manifestations of secondary syphilis in the elderly - A timely reminder for dentists. Aust Dent J. 2013;58(3):368-70. [ Links ]

5. Seibt CE, Munerato MC. Secondary syphilis in the oral cavity and the role of the dental surgeon in STD prevention, diagnosis and treatment: a case series study. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2016;20(4):393-8. [ Links ]

6. Brischetto A, Gassiep I, Whiley D, Norton R. Retrospective Review of Treponema pallidum PCR and Serology Results: Are Both Tests Necessary? J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(5):e01782-17. [ Links ]

7. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estrategia Mundial del Sector de la Salud contra Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual para 2016-2021. Hacia el fin de las ITS. .Internet.. Ginebra, Suiza: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2016 .cited 2020 Jul 15.. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/ghss-stis/es/Links ]

8. Fregnani ER, Pérez-de-Oliveira ME, Parahyba CJ, Perez DE da C. Primary syphilis: An uncommon manifestation in the oral cavity. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017;116(4):326-7. [ Links ]

9. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Syphilis. In: ECDC. Annual epidemiological report for 2017. .Internet.. Stockholm: ECDC; 2019 .cited 2020 Jul 15.. Available from: Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/syphilis-annual-epidemiological-report-2017Links ]

10. Ros-Vivancos C, González-Hernández M, Navarro-Gracia JF, Sánchez-Payá J, González-Torga A, Portilla-Sogorb J. Evolution of treatment of syphilis through history. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018;31(6):485-92. [ Links ]

11. Lautenschlager S. Diagnosis of syphilis: Clinical and laboratory problems. JDDG - J Ger Soc Dermatology. 2006;4(12):1058-75. [ Links ]

12. Leão JC, Gueiros LA, Porter SR. Oral manifestations of syphilis. Clinics. 2006;61(2):161-6. [ Links ]

13. Klausner JD. The great imitator revealed: Syphilis. Top Antivir Med. 2019;27(2):71-4 [ Links ]

14. Leuci S, Martina S, Adamo D, Ruoppo E, Santarelli A, Sorrentino R, et al. Oral Syphilis: A retrospective analysis of 12 cases and a review of the literature. Oral Dis. 2013;19(8):738-46. [ Links ]

15. Murthy V, Vaithilingam Y, Livingstone D, Pillai A. Prosthetic rehabilitation of palatal perforation in a patient with "syphilis: The great imitator." BMJ Case Rep. 2014;1-4. [ Links ]

16. Matias MDP, Jesus AO de, Resende RG, Caldeira PC, Aguiar MCF de. Diagnosing acquired syphilis through oral lesions: the 12 year experience of an Oral Medicine Center. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(3):358-63. [ Links ]

17. Unemo M, Ballard R, Ison C, Lewis D, Ndowa F, Peeling R. Diagnóstico de laboratorio de las infecciones de transmisión sexual, incluida la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana .Internet.. Ginebra, Suiza: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2014 .cited 2020 Jul 15.. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/9789241505840/es/Links ]

18. Newman L, Rowley J, Hoorn S Vander, Wijesooriya NS, Unemo M, Low N, et al. Global Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2012 Based on Systematic Review and Global Reporting. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):1-17. [ Links ]

19. Ministerio de salud. Boletín Estadístico de Enfermedades de Declaración Obligatoria en Costa Rica del año 2015 .Internet.. 2015 .cited 2020 Jul 15.. Available from: https://www.ministeriodesalud.go.cr/index.php/vigilancia-de-la-salud/estadisticas-y-bases-de-datos/notificacion-individual/3167-boletin-de-morbilidad-enfermedades-de-declaracion-obligatoria-2015-2/fileLinks ]

20. Coleman E, Fiahlo A, Brateanu A. Secondary syphilis. Cleve Clin J Med. 2017;84(7):510-1. [ Links ]

21. Peeling RW, Mabey D, Kamb ML, Chen X, David J, Benzaken AS, et al. Syphilis. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2018;3(17073):49. [ Links ]

22. Sun HJ, Samet JM, Ohrr H, Jung HK, Il SK. Smoking and cancer risk in Korean men and women. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(4):341-8. [ Links ]

23. Wong TSC, Wiesenfeld D. Oral Cancer. Aust Dent J. 2018;63:S91-9. [ Links ]

24. Bains MK, Hosseini-Ardehali M. Palatal perforations: Past and present. Two case reports and a literature review. Br Dent J. 2005;199(5):267-9. [ Links ]

25. Huang S, Lu R, Yang JY, Zhou G. A nonspecific ulcer on upper lip presented as the first and sole sign of syphilis. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(12):1309-12. [ Links ]

26. Zhang W, Mao Q, Lyu X, Hua H, Yan Z. Diagnosis of oral syphilis remains a challenge - A case report. Int J Infect Dis .Internet.. 2020;99:231-2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.049Links ]

27. Çakmak SK, Tamer E, Karadag AS, Waugh M. Syphilis: A great imitator. Clin Dermatol. 2019;37(3):182-91. [ Links ]

28. Calvo DF, Cassarino D, Fernandez-Flores A. Syphilitic Chancre of the Lip. Am J Dermatopathol. 2020;42(10):e143-6. [ Links ]

29. Porterfield C, Brodell D, Dolohanty L, Scott G. Primary Syphilis Presenting As a Chronic Lip Ulcer. Cureus. 2020;12(2):1-7. [ Links ]

30. Workowski Kimberly A, Bolan Gail A C for DC and P. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(33):1-137. [ Links ]

31. Scott CM, Flint SR. Oral syphilis - Re-emergence of an old disease with oral manifestations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(1):58-63. [ Links ]

32. Report on global sexually transmitted infection surveillance, 2018 .Internet.. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. IGO; 2018 .cited 2020 Jul 15.. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/stis-surveillance-2018/en/Links ]

33. Rowley J, Hoorn S Vander, Korenromp E, Low N, Unemo M, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: Global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(8):548-62. [ Links ]

Note informed consent: The patient provided his free and informed written consent for the publication of his case.

Declaration of interests: The authors certify that they have no commercial nor association interests that represents a conflict of interests in connection with the manuscript

Funding sources: The are no financial commitments with others state or private institutions thay may affect the content, results or conclusions of this article

Authors' contribution note: 1.Conception and design of study 2.Acquisition of data 3.Data analysis 4.Discussion of results 5.Drafting of the manuscript 6.Approval of the final version of the manuscript. YVBO ha contribuido en: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. SMBO ha contribuido en: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Editor’s opinion: This article has been accepted by the Odontoestomatología’s editor Dra. Vanessa Pereira-Prado

Received: July 28, 2020; Accepted: January 13, 2021

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons