SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número29Factores que influyen las decisiones terapéuticas en Ortodoncia: Revisión de la literaturaEvaluación del impacto en la calidad de vida de pacientes adultos rehabilitados con nuevas prótesis removibles totales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Odontoestomatología

versión impresa ISSN 0797-0374versión On-line ISSN 1688-9339

Odontoestomatología vol.19 no.29 Montevideo jun. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.22592/ode2017n29p52 

Articles

Oral health condition of children who attended University Dental Services in Porto Alegre (Brazil) and Córdoba (Argentina)

FPM Carletto-Körber1  , MC Figueiredo2  , MG Giménez3  , J Martínez3  , LS Cornejo4 

1 Integral Niños y Adolescentes, área Odontopediatría “A”. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-Argentina. fabianacarletto@hotmail.com

2Faculdad de Odontología de la Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul\UFRGS, Brasil

3Hospital Universitario de Maternidad y Neonatología. Facultad de Ciencia Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-Argentina

4Facultad de Odontología. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-Argentina

ABSTRACT

Abstract:Objective: To compare the oral health condition of children in relation to social, demographic and cultural maternal and perinatal aspects. Methods: Dental clinical examinations were performed on 92 children aged ≤3. They attended the Dental Clinic of the School of Dentistry, UNC Córdoba, Argentina (n=32), and the Infant Clinic, School of Dentistry, UFRG Porto Alegre-Brazil (n=60). The mothers signed a written informed consent. A semi-structured interview designed ad hoc was conducted with mothers or companions of the child to consider social, demographic and cultural aspects, oral hygiene habits, gestation, diet and type of delivery and lactation. Pearson-Fisher Chi2 test was applied to evaluate the significance (p <0.05) differences between cohorts. The importance of various factors in relation to caries experience and cohort was evaluated using binary logistic regression. Results: The reason why patients seek consultation was significantly different between cohorts: 100% preventive in Argentina versus 8.3% in Brazil (p <0.001), also considering caries experience (p <0.05). The binary logistic regression model showed that cohort and caries-free variables were the factors most significantly associated with caries experience. Mother’s low educational level, cariogenic diet in the baby and type of delivery indicate greater cariogenic risk. Regarding cohorts, the following factors appear as statistically significant: hygiene, age, baby’s diet and type of delivery. Conclusion: Mothers’ educational level and the baby’s cariogenic diet show increased risk of caries activity for both cohorts. Oral hygiene, baby’s diet and type of delivery differ significantly between cohorts.

Keywords: oral health; preschoolers; Latin America

Introduction

Dental caries and gingivitis are diseases that allow us to assess the oral health conditions of a given population. They can be influenced by the different biological and sociocultural factors of the individuals 1.

Parents’ habits and knowledge about oral health have been observed to have an impact on their children’s oral health 2,3. Findings also show that a low socioeconomic status in the household 4,5 and parents’ unfavorable oral health habits 1,6 may contribute to the development of dental caries. In addition, the mother’s beliefs, habits and behavior and the environment where the child is raised may favor microbial colonization in the child’s oral cavity.

A newborn’s oral cavity is basically free of microorganisms. Soon after birth, numerous bacteria begin to colonize the mouth. Dental eruption provides a surface for Streptococcus mutans colonization, a microorganism that is closely linked to caries risk. Frequent contact between the mother and the child may cause early colonization and bacteria transmission 7. Several studies agree that the mother is the child’s primary source of infection through cariogenic bacteria 8-10. Among the many factors that affect oral health in early childhood, the relevance of mother (caregiver) to child transmission and S. mutans genetic similarity have been shown 11, as well as their correlation to knowledge, attitudes and socioeconomic status 12. In addition, children with a record of caries in early childhood are more prone to future decay of their permanent teeth 13.

As oral hygiene and its quality have also been addressed as key factors for oral health care, it is important to provide the population with information about healthy practices regarding adult and child dental caries.

This work compares the oral health condition of children under the age of three, who attended University Dental Services in Porto Alegre (Brazil) and Córdoba (Argentina), and the potential correlation with social, demographic, cultural, maternal and perinatal aspects.

Materials and methods

Population and sample under study

A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted based on clinical-dental indicators and their potential correlation with oral health risk indicators. The population studied was a group of 92 children under the age of three who attended the University Dental Services, Infant Dental Clinic (n=60) in Porto Alegre (Brazil) and a Dental Clinic (n=32) in Córdoba (Argentina) for care. These services have no connection to others in the public or private sectors and are the only ones within their area of coverage that provide comprehensive mother-child oral health care.

The mothers signed a written informed consent to participate together with their children in the study. A semi-structured interview designed ad hoc was conducted with mothers or companions of the child to consider social, demographic and cultural aspects, oral hygiene habits, gestation, diet, type of delivery and lactation.

Dental clinical examination

The children were examined at the offices of the University Dental Services, Dentistry Clinic of the School of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC) and at the Infant Clinic, School of Dentistry of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). A disposable examination kit (mirror, tweezers and sickle probe) was used following the standard physical-visual exam procedure. Each child’s caries experience in primary dentition was expressed through the DMFT index WHO standards 14.

Statistical analysis

InfoStat 2003 for Windows was used to statistically process the data. Mean and median ± EE were used for the descriptive analysis of quantitative variables. Relative frequencies expressed as percentages were calculated for the categorical variables. Pearson-Fisher Chi2 test was applied to evaluate the significance of the differences between cohorts, based on the nature of the variable, with a significance value of p<0.05. A binary logistic regression model was used to determine the correlation and relevance of the different factors regarding caries experience and cohort. The most relevant variables were entered into the model. Categorical variables were either transformed into dichotomous variables or different categories were grouped to include them in the model without losing statistical power, as shown in Table 1. Odds ratios were calculated for each factor.

Table 1: Variable classification 

Results

We studied 92 children under the age of three. We identified two cohorts based on country of residence. The Brazil cohort: 60 children who live in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul or nearby communities (F: 48.3%; M: 51.7%), and the Argentina cohort: 32 children who live in Córdoba or nearby. (F: 65.6%; M: 34.4%). The mean age of Brazilian children was 27.0±10.8 months, while in Argentina it was 15.4±6.8 months. These differences turned out to be significant (ANOVA p<0.001).

The reason why both cohorts sought consultation is shown in Table 2. In Argentina, 100% of the cases were for preventive care, while in Brazil only 8.3% of the children sought preventive care and over half, 56.7%, needed caries treatment. (Pearson Chi2 test: p<0.001).

Table 2: Cohort vs. reasons for consultation. Case recount and percentage 

In terms of caries experience (table 3), significant differences were found between the cohorts (Fisher: p=0.015; p<0.05): Brazilian children showed a higher percentage of caries activity (38.3%) than Argentinean children (12.5%).

Table 3: Cohort vs. with caries experience. Case recount and percentage 

Although differences between cohorts were not significant for the caries-free variable (table 4) (Fisher: p=0.178; p>0.05), Brazilian children (96.7%) showed a higher percentage in the category that presented no etiological factors than children in Córdoba (87.5%).

Table 4: Cohort vs. caries-free Case recount and percentage. 

In terms of healthy and risky oral health habits, we observed that (table 5) the percentage of children who use pacifiers is higher in the Argentinean cohort (46.9%) than in the Brazilian cohort (31.7%). The differences were not statistically significant (Fisher: p=0.177; p>0.05). Children in Argentina do not have oral hygiene habits, which made the difference with the Brazilian cohort significant (Pearson Chi2: p<0.001). Therefore, we found the same results with the use of toothpaste, use of fluoride, daily brushing frequency and time.

Table 5: Cohort vs. healthy and risky oral health habits. Case recount and percentage 

Table 6 shows the factors associated to caries experience in a decreasing order of significance. OR were calculated for each factor identifying in each case the reference category considered in relation to the risk of cariogenic activity. The cohort and caries-free variables were the most relevant ones.

Table 6: Factors associated to “Caries experience”; Risk Category; Wald statistical value; Level of significance (p-value; Exp. (B) or Odds ratio (OR) and OR confidence interval. 

Factor significance in relation to cohort is shown in table 7. The variables “frequency of brushing”, “time of brushing”, “use of toothpaste”, and “use of fluoride” were omitted when implementing the model as we had already established that percentage differences between cohorts are very statistically significant. The variables “age” (months), “baby’s diet” and “type of delivery” also showed significant differences between cohorts.

Table 7: The variables associated to “Cohort”; Risk Category; Wald Statistical Value; Significance Level (p-value; Exp.(B) or Odds ratio (OR) and OR confidence interval. 

In general, mother’s educational level (table 8) was similar for both cohorts, with no significant differences (Pearson Chi2 Test: p=0.138; p>0.05). However, a significant difference was found (p<0.05) in the higher education / University level.

Table 8: Cohort vs. Mother’s educational level. Case recount and percentage 

Significant discrepancies were observed between cohorts when considering the baby’s caregiver (table 9) (Pearson Chi2 Test: p=0.026; p<0.05), particularly when considering the categories: mother exclusively and shared mother/grandparents (Z tests; p<0.05).

Table 9: Cohort vs. baby’s caregiver. Case recount and percentage 

Although some differences were found between cohorts regarding the father’s occupation, these were not significant (Pearson Chi2 Test: p=0.309; p>0.05). In addition, the mother’s occupation did not show significant differences between cohorts either.

As shown in table 10, all the children in Argentina developed in a normal pregnancy, while in Brazil, 88.3% did, although the differences are not significant (Fisher: p=0.091; p>0.05).

Table 10: Cohort vs. pregnancy. Case recount and percentage 

The differences between cohorts were significant when considering the variable “type of delivery” (table 11), as 87.5% of the children in Córdoba were born through normal delivery, a much higher percentage than the one observed in Porto Alegre, Brazil (56.7%). In this cohort, caesarean sections accounted for 33% (one third) of the children (Pearson Chi2Test: p=0.014; p<0.05).

Table 11: Cohort vs. Type of delivery. Case recount and percentage 

Regarding mother and infant’s diet (table 12), more children were breast-fed in Brazil (70%) than in Córdoba (53.1%) (Pearson Chi2 Test: p<0.05). Over half the mothers in Argentina consumed cariogenic foods during pregnancy, while this percentage was lower in Brazil (36.7%). The differences were not statistically significant (Chi2 test; Fisher’s exact test: p=0.184; p>0.05). Statistically significant differences were found in the baby’s diet category (Fisher: p=0.022 p<0.05). Over half the children in the cohort in Córdoba had a cariogenic diet (53.1%), compared to only 26.7% of the children in Brazil.

Table 12: Cohort vs. Mother and infant’s diet. Case recount and percentage 

Discussion

Dental medicine for babies has officially become a worldwide trend in dental care in early childhood, thanks to the development of education programs, the implementation of preventive measures and caries control, primary care and age-specific curative treatments 15. In addition, oral care can contribute to preserving primary dentition and promoting the child’s wellbeing 3,4,16.

This study presents the data of children who attended the University Dental Services of the Dental Clinic of UNC School of Dentistry and the Infant Dental Clinic of the UFRGS School of Dentistry. The oldest children were three years old. This is consistent with earlier studies conducted by Figueiredo et al. 16 in 2008 and Emerim et al. 17 in 2012, which show a philosophical shift in Pediatric Dentistry. These data show an evolution in the principles of care at University Dental Services, as they reveal a move towards the guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD), which recommend the first visit to the Pediatric Dentist should take place between the eruption of the first primary tooth and the child’s first year of life 18. The first appointments of the children of the Argentinean cohort took place at a mean age of 15.4 ± 6.8 months old. The reasons why patients sought consultation on 100% of the cases was preventive care.

A key aspect for dental care programs in early childhood is education and awareness raising among parents regarding their children’s oral health, as family members play a major role in developing the child’s eating and oral hygiene habits 19,20,21.

Health habits can apply to all household members, as once parents become more aware, they turn into change agents in favor of oral and overall health. Working with family members is important because humans are social beings subject to biological, psychological and social hazards, and within this context, a person’s family determines their behavior, has an influence on decision-making and helps develop habits. In 2008, Fracasso et al. 22 reinforced this concept when they observed the influence the mother figure has on the oral health condition of children. We must remember this, as the mothers in this study were the main responsible figure at the infants’ appointments in Brazil and Argentina. Another important finding was the significant correlation between the assisted delivery type and the children’s caries risk category, confirming the findings of Benites et al., 23, who observed that women who had had a vaginal delivery and described a non-cariogenic diet by breastfeeding their children for a longer period tend to have a lower caries incidence.

In addition, diet and nutrition are vital for the physical and psychological development of children from conception; these factors are directly connected to the oral cavity from odontogenesis to the development of oral pathologies. Studies conducted by Adair et al. 3 have shown the influence carbohydrates, especially sugars, have on the occurrence of carious lesions. Poor eating habits, such as the intake of sugary substances in the baby’s bottle, are closely tied to early Streptococcus mutans colonization, one of the main cariogenic bacteria in the oral cavity 7-10.

The information in this study reinforces the correlation between inadequate eating habits and carious lesions, as both children from Argentina and Brazil with caries experience followed a cariogenic diet: over half the children in the Córdoba cohort and 30% in the Porto Alegre cohort.

These findings reinforce the multifactorial etiology of caries, where the joint action of several etiological factors is needed, that is, a cariogenic diet, poor oral hygiene, susceptible host and Streptococcus mutans oral infection: together they create an environment that promotes the development of carious lesions 7-10. Regarding healthy habits and oral health risk, we observed that children in Argentina do not have oral hygiene habits, and there was a significant difference with the Brazilian cohort. Therefore, we found the same results with the use of toothpaste, use of fluoride, daily brushing frequency and time.

These findings allow us to stress the importance of sociocultural aspects in the dental care practices of babies, and it also reinforces the need of Latin American children and their parents for access to oral health care programs from the first year of the child’s life. In addition, it warns about the need for these programs to collect epidemiological information for the timely identification of oral habits in early childhood, assessment and counselling for parents, as early diagnosis of new carious lesions is essential to establish oral health promotion efforts.

Finally, this study clearly proves that when working in the field of dental medicine for infants, clinicians establish a link between the scientific community and the population under study, which goes beyond the geographical borders of the countries involved, fostering knowledge exchange between both sides.

Supplementary support

Teacher exchange. Asociación de Universidades Grupo Montevideo - AUGM 2014 and 2015.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest

Referencias

1. Contandriopoulos AP. Elementos para una &raquo;,» &reg;,® &sect;,§ &shy;,­ &sup1;,¹ &sup2;,² &sup3;,³ &szlig;,ß &THORN;,Þ &thorn;,þ &times;,× &Uacute;,Ú &uacute;,ú &Ucirc;,Û &ucirc;,û &Ugrave;,Ù &ugrave;,ù &uml;,¨ &Uuml;,Ü &uuml;,ü &Yacute;,Ý &yacute;,ý &yen;,¥ &yuml;,ÿ &para;,¶ topografía &raquo;,» &reg;,® &sect;,§ &shy;,­ &sup1;,¹ &sup2;,² &sup3;,³ &szlig;,ß &THORN;,Þ &thorn;,þ &times;,× &Uacute;,Ú &uacute;,ú &Ucirc;,Û &ucirc;,û &Ugrave;,Ù &ugrave;,ù &uml;,¨ &Uuml;,Ü &uuml;,ü &Yacute;,Ý &yacute;,ý &yen;,¥ &yuml;,ÿ &para;,¶ del concepto de Salud. Ruptures, Rev Interdiscipl Salud. 2006; 11(1): 86-99. [ Links ]

2. Mattila ML, Rautava P, Ojanlatva A, Paunio P, Hyssälä L, Helenius H, et al. Will the role of family influence dental caries among seven-year-old children? Acta Odontol Scand. 2005; 63:73-84. [ Links ]

3. Adair PM, Pine CM, Burnside G, Nicoll AD, Gillett A, Anwar S, et al. Familial and cultural perceptions and beliefs of oral hygiene and dietary practices among ethnically and socio-economically diverse groups. Community Dent Health. 2004; 21:102-11. [ Links ]

4. Petersen PE. Socio behavior all risk factors in dental caries international perspectives. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33:274-9. [ Links ]

5. Källestål C, Wall S. Socio-economic effect on caries. Incidence data among Swedish 12-14-year-olds. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002; 30:108-14. [ Links ]

6. Okada M, Kawamura M, Kaihara Y, Matsuzaki Y, Kuwahara S, Ishidori H, et al. Influence of parents&apos; oral health behaviour on oral health status of their school children: an exploratory study employing a causal modelling technique. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002; 12:101-8. [ Links ]

7. Alaluusua S, Renkonen OV. Streptococcus mutans establishment and dental caries experience in children from 2 to 4 years old. Scand J Dent Res.1983; 91:453-7. [ Links ]

8. Caufield PW. Dental caries: a transmissible and infectious disease revisited: a position paper. Pediatr Dent. 1997; 19: 491-8. [ Links ]

9. Köhler B, Bratthall D, Krasse B. Preventive measures in mothers influence the establishment of the bacterium Streptococcus mutans in their infants. Arch Oral Biol. 1983; 28:225-31. [ Links ]

10. Carletto Körber, F P; Jiménez, M G; Cornejo L S. Early acquisition of Streptococcus mutans for children. AOL. Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana. 2005; 18(2):69-74. [ Links ]

11. Carletto Körber FPM, González Ittig RE, Jiménez MG, Cornejo LS. Initial acquisition and genetic identity of Streptococcus mutans of mother-child pairs. Pediatric Dentistry 2010; 32(3): 389-395. [ Links ]

12. Amin MS, Harrison RL. Understanding parents&apos; oral health behaviors for their young children. Qual Health Res. 2009; 19: 116-27. [ Links ]

13. Rowan-Legg A, Canadian Paediatric Society, Community Paediatrics Committee. Oral health care for children - a call for action. Paediatrics Child Health. 2013; 18(1):37-43. [ Links ]

14. World Health Organization Oral health surverys, basic methods. 2nd ed. Geneva. 1997. [ Links ]

15. Figueiredo MC, Araujo DR, Michel JÁ, Garcia AFG, Schreiner M. In: Anais da Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisas Odontológicas XII. Águas de São Pedro. Avaliação de 5 anos de um Programa Odontológico Materno-Infantil com Bases Educativa, Preventiva e Curativa. São Paulo: 1995; 11: 137. [ Links ]

16. Figueiredo MC, Guarienti CAD, Michel JA, Sampaio MS. Comprehensive attention to oral health in early childhood: a longitudinal evaluation of the infant clinic program of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Acta Odontol. Latinoam. 2008; 21 (2): 181-187. [ Links ]

17. Emerim JS, Silva LVR, Sampaio MS, Figueiredo MC. Perfil dos Pacientes Atendidos na Bebê Clínica da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul entre os anos de 2006 e 2011. UEPG Biol. Health Sci, Ponta Grossa. 2012; 18 (2) 93-100. [ Links ]

18. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Fast Facts Visit. Disponible en: http://www.aapd.org/media/FastFacts.pdf. Acceso 29 de junio de 2016. [ Links ]

19. Barros SG, Alves AC, Pugliese LS, Reis SR. A Contribuição ao estudo da cárie dentária em crianças de 0-30 meses. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2001; 15 (3): 215. [ Links ]

20. Cavalcanti AL, Carvalho LF, Pereira LL, Medeiros AD, Valença AMG, Duarte DC. Primeira Consulta Odontológica: Percepções dos Cirurgiões-Dentistas quanto ao Período Ideal. J Bras Odontopediatr Odontol Bebê. 2002; 5 (27): 420-24. [ Links ]

21. Moura LFAD, Lira DMMP, Moura MS, Barros SSLV, Lopes TSP, Leopoldino VD, Moura MD. Apresentação do Programa Preventivo para gestantes e bebês. J Bras Odontopediatr Odontol Bebe. 2001; 4 (17): 10-14. [ Links ]

22. Fracasso MLC, Marchi V, Goya S, Provenzano MGA, Takahashi K. Perfil das mães e crianças frequentadoras do programa clínica de bebês, no núcleo integrado de saúde nis III Iguaçu em Maringá - PR. Revista Saúde e Pesquisa. 2008; 1 (3): 325-329. [ Links ]

23. Benites D, Gomes E, Figueiredo MC, Lima IF, Carletto-Körber F. Influence of the type of birth and the mother´s diet on the breastfeeding period. J Oral Res 2014; 3(3); 150-155. [ Links ]

Received: July 08, 2016; Accepted: December 08, 2016

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons