SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue1Work context and family well-being: the role of psychological capital and the organizational culturePsychometric properties of the Revised Olweus Bully/Bullied Questionnaire for Children in Spanish author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Related links

Share


Ciencias Psicológicas

Print version ISSN 1688-4094On-line version ISSN 1688-4221

Cienc. Psicol. vol.17 no.1 Montevideo  2023  Epub June 01, 2023

https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.2777 

Original Articles

Concerns about cancer recurrence in Mexican women breast cancer survivors. Psychometric properties of the CARS scale

Preocupaciones acerca de la recurrencia del cáncer en mujeres supervivientes de cáncer de mama mexicanas. Propiedades psicométricas de la escala CARS

Preocupações sobre a recorrência do câncer em mulheres mexicanas sobreviventes do câncer de mama. Propriedades psicométricas da escala CARS

Mónica Ramírez-Orozco1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-8200

Mario Enrique Rojas-Russell2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-1384

Oscar Galindo-Vázquez3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9395-2921

Rebeca Robles-García4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5958-7393

Rosario Costas-Muñiz5 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0942-5657

Juan Enrique Bargalló-Rocha6 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-0332

Abelardo Meneses-García7 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-4598

1 Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico

2 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico

3 Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico

4 Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría, Mexico

5 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences. Immigrant Health & Cancer Disparities, United States

6 Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico

7 Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico


Abstract:

Fear of recurrence is one of the main affectations of cancer survivors. In Latin-American exist a lack of evidence on the subject and of valid instruments to measure it. The objective of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Concerns About Recurrence Scale in Mexican breast cancer survivors. An instrumental study was carried out with 200 women breast cancer survivors with a mean age of 53 years old and a mean survival of 52.5 months. A confirmatory factor analysis of the original version of the scale identified four factors that explained 77 % of the variance and satisfactory goodness of fit indicators: CFI = .967, TLI = .957, SRMR = .035, RMSEA = .071 as well as high internal consistency α = .945. Significant associations were also identified between general fear subscale, anxiety subscale of the HADS and total HADS score (r = .638 and r = .607; p = .01). The CARS presented adequate validity, reliability and factorial structure. It is recommended for usage in clinical care and research with Mexican breast cancer survivors.

Keywords: survival; breast cancer; fear of recurrence; Mexico; anxiety

Resumen:

El miedo a la recurrencia es una de las principales afectaciones de los supervivientes de cáncer. En América Latina existe una falta de evidencia en el tema y de instrumentos válidos para medirlo. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Preocupaciones Acerca del Cáncer (CARS, por su sigla en inglés) en supervivientes de cáncer de mama mexicanas. Se llevó a cabo un estudio instrumental con 200 mujeres supervivientes de cáncer mamario con una edad promedio de 53 años y una sobrevida promedio de 52.5 meses. Un análisis factorial confirmatorio de la versión original del instrumento identificó cuatro factores que explicaron el 77 % de la varianza de la escala e indicadores de bondad de ajuste satisfactorios: CFI = .967, TLI = .957, SRMR = .035, RMSEA = .071, así como una elevada consistencia interna α = .945. Asimismo, se identificaron asociaciones significativas entre las subescalas de miedo general, ansiedad de la HADS y puntaje total de la HADS (r = .638 y r= .607; p= .01). La escala CARS presentó adecuada validez, confiabilidad y estructura factorial. Es recomendable su uso en escenarios clínicos y de investigación con supervivientes de cáncer de mama mexicanas.

Palabras clave: supervivencia; cáncer de mama; miedo a la recurrencia; México; ansiedad

Resumo:

O medo da recorrência é uma das principais sequelas dos sobreviventes do câncer. Na América Latina há uma falta de evidências sobre o assunto e uma falta de instrumentos válidos para medi-lo. O objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar as propriedades psicométricas da Escala Preocupações sobre o Câncer (CARS) em sobreviventes do câncer de mama mexicanas. Foi realizado um estudo instrumental com 200 mulheres sobreviventes de câncer de mama com uma média de idade de 53 anos e uma sobrevivência média de 52,5 meses. Uma análise fatorial confirmatória da versão original do instrumento identificou quatro fatores que explicaram 77 % da variação da escala e indicadores satisfatórios de bondade de ajuste: CFI = 0,967, TLI = 0,957, SRMR = 0,035, RMSEA = 0,071, assim como alta consistência interna α = 0,945. Associações significativas também foram identificadas entre as subescalas de medo geral, ansiedade HADS e pontuação total HADS (r = 0,638 e r = 0,607; p = 0,01). A escala CARS mostrou adequada validade, confiabilidade e estrutura de fatores. É recomendado seu uso em ambientes clínicos e de pesquisa com sobreviventes do câncer de mama mexicanas.

Palavras-chave: sobrevivência; câncer de mama; medo da recorrência; México; ansiedade

By January 2022, the United States of America had little more than 4 million breast cancer survivors (American Cancer Society, 2022). In Mexico, the National Cancer Institute (INCan) has a registry of 3,800 survivors until 2019, of which about 48 % are from breast cancer and 79% have a survival greater than 5 years (Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 2018).

The fear of recurrence is one of the main affectations with prevalence ranging from 39 % to 97 % of which more than 80 % report moderate or high levels of this fear (Fiszer et al., 2014; Merckaert et al., 2017; National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), 2022; Park & Lim, 2022; Simard et al., 2013). Unlike some anxiety disorders, fear of recurrence is a response to a real threat, and this particular fear is experienced by many survivors up to 10 years after completing treatments (Thewes et al., 2012).

There are several instruments that assess fear of cancer recurrence among which The Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS; Vickberg, 2003) stands out because it´s the only one designed specifically for breast cancer survivors.

The original version through an exploratory factor analysis was formed by 26 items distributed in four factors significantly correlated with each other that explained 70% of the variance and evaluated the specific concerns about the recurrence. Two validations of the scale have been published in breast cancer survivor populations, one Japanese (Momino et al., 2014) with 26 items and four factors with two of them renamed as “Self-concept” and “Roles”. The other one is a Dutch version (van den Beuken-van Everdingen et al., 2008) who also identified four factors but a total of 20 items. Both versions showed significant correlations between factors, adequate internal consistency (Japan: α = .85 to .94; Dutch: α = .94 overall fear, α = .88 to .94 by subscales) and evaluated convergent validity with The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) but only the Dutch version has a confirmatory factor analysis with adequate fit indices (SRMR = 0.088, CFI = .956).

Based on this data and the lack of evidence about the use of the CARS in Latin America, we considered necessary to comply with the objective of examine the internal consistency, confirmatory factorial structure, and convergent validity of the CARS in Spanish for Mexico for its future clinical use in this population with the explicit approval of the entire process by the original author Suzanne M. Johnson Vickberg.

Method

Design

An instrumental study carried out at the Breast Tumor Clinic of The National Cancer Institute of México. The scale adaptation procedure was by translation, re-translation. The original English version was translated into Spanish by two certified translators with knowledge in the areas of health psychology and psychology. Then, the Spanish version was sent to a third bilingual expert for its re-translation to English. Since there were no differences in the wording with the original scale, an adequate translation was confirmed to proceed to evaluation by judges for validity check (Mora-Ríos et al., 2013). Fifteen judges’ experts in psychology, health psychology, medicine and nursing (with experience in oncology) evaluated the understanding of the items, instructions and response options based on the criteria of writing, relevance, content validity, face validity, theoretical validity and language appropriate for the population of this Spanish version.

From this judgment the following changes were made: a synthesis of instructions, wording modification in the item 12 (“Threaten my identity, how I see myself” to “Affect how I see myself”), and two wording proposals for the last answer option (very much or extremely). Content validity was agreed for all items as well as face validity, theoretical validity and appropriate language for the population.

Then, proceed to the pilot test with the population of interest (Carretero Dios & Pérez Meléndez, 2005). The pilot test was carried out in a sample of 30 participants according to the international guidelines of Koller et al. (2007) to assess difficulty, confusion or offensive questions, comprehension of item 12 was confirmed with the new redaction, as well as the answer option extremely as more understandable.

Participants

Through intentional sampling, 200 participants (30 additional for a pilot test) were selected based on the criteria for choosing the sample of Nunnally and Bernstein (1995), who suggest 5 to 10 subjects by item, and Hernández Sampieri et al. (2016), which establish a criterion of 30 to 60 participants for pilot test. Women over 18 years of age, with a confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer (stages 0-III), who had completed cancer treatment (although they could be receiving hormonal treatment), had started surveillance phase and who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study were included. The study was approved by the Research Committee and the Research Ethics Committee of the hospital where the study was conducted under registration number (019/067/POI) (CEI/1345/18). The data collection was carried out through the review of electronic files and directly with patients from November 2019 to March 2020.

Measures

Clinical identification card prepared ad hoc for this study to collect sociodemographic and clinical data of the participants such as age, marital status, confirmed diagnosis, received treatments, etc.

Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS) (Vickberg, 2003). Consisting of 30 questions: four questions with 6 Likert-type response options to evaluate general fear of recurrence and 26 questions that conform four factors: concerns about health, concerns about womanhood, concerns about roles, and concerns about death; with five response options ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) to determine specific concerns about recurrence. Overall fear index showed general reliability of α = .87 and by subscale from α = .89 to α = .94.

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Mexican oncological population (HADS-M) (Galindo Vázquez et al., 2015). Version validated and adapted for the Mexican oncological population, it’s a self-applied 12-item questionnaire with four Likert-type response options with a total satisfactory Cronbach α coefficient of .86 and specific of .79 for anxiety and .80 for depression. The cut-off points indicate, from zero to five, clinical absence of anxiety or depression, from 6-8 mild anxiety/depression, from 9 to 11 moderate anxiety/depression and from 12 onwards severe anxiety/depression.

Procedure

Potential participants were identified through the hospital's electronic record system to verify inclusion criteria, then, were recruited in the waiting room of the Breast Tumor Clinic of The National Cancer Institute of México. After explanation of the research and the inclusion criteria, each decided to participate freely under the signature of the informed consent and answered the questionnaires with the support of a researcher.

Analysis of data

Given that the distribution of items and factors of the scale have been previously adjusted with the theory, the purpose of making the confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) was to corroborate the structure of the instruments according to its theoretical model, which represents a methodological contribution to the instrument.

According to Finney and DiStefano (2006), who suggest that if the observed data have many categories, at least five response options and a distribution close to normal, the CFA was carried out using the maximum likelihood model and the evaluation of the fit of the model was based on the fit indices mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = .50-.80), standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR ≤ 0.08); as well as the CFI and TLI ≥ .90 values (Batista-Foguet et al., 2004; Herrero, 2010; Morata-Ramirez et al., 2015).

Cronbach's alpha reliability index was considered for the total scale and each factor, and the convergent validity was evaluated through Pearson's correlation with the HADS Scale considering a significance level of p < .05.

Using quartiles, the cutoff points for each factor were established. The original version of the scale (Vickberg, 2003) designated scores below the 25th quartile as being of no concern, scores between the 26th and 50th percentile as being of little or some concern, scores between the 51st and 75th percentile as being of moderate concern, and scores above the 75th percentile as being of extreme concern. The cut-off points of the general fear subscale (first four items) were not modified from the original version because these items did not undergo any change.

Results

The data were analyzed with the statistical package STATA 14 for Windows (StataCorp, 2015). A total of 200 women between 29 and 81 years old participated (mean age of 52+ 9.5 years); most of them (72 %) without a partner, practicing the Catholic religion (72.5 %), with a low socioeconomic level (71.4 %) and dedicated home (65 %). Almost half of them with a basic educational level (47.5 %), considering the national educational average of 9.1 years of study (Table 1).

An average survival time of 52 months (4.3 years) was observed, 34 % with some comorbidity, among which, the most frequent were cardiovascular and metabolic (31 %). Eighty-eight % of the participants were diagnosed in an early stage of the disease (0-IIIA), either radical or simple mastectomy, was the surgery mostly performed (66.5 %) with 74.5 % who did not undergo a process of cosmetic reconstruction of the breast. Forty-one % received a combination scheme of 2 treatments and finally 10.5 % were positive for some genetic mutation, being alteration in BRCA1 the most frequent (38 %) followed by BRCA 2 with 28.6 %. (Table 1).

On the other hand, 26.7 % reported having had some mental health problem prior to the evaluation, mainly anxiety or depression (10 % each); when evaluating this symptomatology with the HADS scale, 26.5 % of the participants reported some level of anxiety symptoms (mild, moderate or severe, according to the cut-off points of the version in Spanish for Mexico for cancer patients; Galindo Vázquez et al., 2015) and a 17.5 % of depression symptoms.

CFA for the specific concerns section resulted in 14 questions with factor loadings from .63 to .94, distributed in four factors that explained 77 % of the variance renamed “General Concerns”, “Functionality”, “Self-concept” and “Concerns for Death” (Figure 1). It is important to mention that during the process, different models were probed among which stand out a 26 items-four factor model, a bifactor model with 17 items and the final model for which the main goodness-of-fit indices were adequate: CFI = .967, TLI = .957, RMR = 0.035, RMSEA = .071, Coefficient of determination CD = .995 showing to be the best option with better fit-indices and greater parsimony (Table 2).

As it shows in the model (Figure 1), 12 questions were eliminated, due to their low factorial loads (< .40), to the fact that they scored in more than one factor, to their low discrimination capacity in the response options and/or their clinical relevance. For example, items such as “Makes me feel less feminine”, “Affects my spirituality or my faith”, “Makes me feel less of a woman”, “Damage my self-confidence” even showed low understanding on the part of the participants from the moment of piloting the instrument.

The four independent questions about general fear that was excluded from the factorial analysis showed a Cronbach's α of .923 (according to analysis carried out based on the original version). The described model obtained by the factor analysis (with 14 items distributed in 4 factors) showed a Cronbach's α general reliability index of α = .94, and by factor of α = .87 for General-Concerns, Functionality α = .91, Self-concept α = .78, Death α = .86 and the general fear subscale α = .92. This shows that CARS-M is reliable for measuring fear of breast cancer recurrence and the specific concerns derived from said fear.

Table 1: Sample characteristics 

Note: Mutation n = 21. Ht: Hormone-therapy; RMM: Radical Modified Mastectomy; MT: Simple Mastectomy; CC: Conserved Surgery; VUS: Variant of uncertain meaning (Spanish acronym). Single Schema: chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonotherapy; Double Schema: 2 treatment combination; Triple Schema: chemo, radio & hormonotherapy. Anx: Anxiety; Dep: Depression.

Figure 1: Structural Model of 4 factors for Mexican survivors (N = 200) 

Table 2: Models tested with goodness-of-fit indices during the CFA 

With the cut-off points stablished it is observed that 48 % reported moderate to extreme fear of recurrence with main concerns about their functionality could be affected as a result of a recurrence (53.5 % moderate extreme) or could cause death (48.5 %) (Table 3).

Table 3: Levels of fear of and concerns about recurrence 

The CARS-M positively correlated with the HADS scale (r = .587; p = .01) and the HADS anxiety subscale (r = .625; p = .01). Likewise, all factors correlated positively and moderate to high with each other (r = .628-.847; p < .001) and with the general fear subscale of the CARS-M (r= .532-.754; p < .001) as shows in Table 4.

Table 4: Convergent Validity CARS-M /HADS and subscales correlations  

* p < .01

Discussion

The described results show CARS-M scale as the first valid and reliable instrument to measure this construct in Mexico and Latin America, an instrument easy to use in clinical settings and understandable for the population. However, unlike the original version and both previous validations (Japan and Dutch), Mexican version was formed by 14 items. As part of the cultural adaptation process, the factors Health, Role and Womanhood were restructured and renamed according to the characteristics of the items, remaining as General Concerns, Self-concept and Functionality. This because the terms were considered more appropriate in relation to their content and language of the population. So, these adjustments reveal socio-cultural differences between populations, for example, education level, level of literacy that could derive in the ability to understand the reagents.

The adequate fit indices show that the CARS is a valid instrument for use in the screening of cancer survivors, even virtually. When comparing the scores of fear of recurrence between the Mexican population, the United States and the Netherlands, they show similarity (55 %, 56 % and 47 % respectively) with 53 % reporting none or minimum levels comparing with 46 % and 44 %.

Nevertheless, it should be noted that practically a quarter of the participants (21.5 %) have no fear of recurrence, which should be analyzed and compared with other populations, since not having any fear could be considered poor functioning and imply a lack of self-care behaviors (Jones et al., 2016). So, according to the literature, it could be considered that the participants show a possible avoidant coping style which leads to minimizing the situation and greater negative consequences on health (Lai et al., 2020) or face a phenomenon of hopelessness (Ravindran et al., 2019).

This avoidance is one of the coping styles most reported by breast cancer survivors using strategies such as self-distraction, denial, behavioral and cognitive disconnection, alcohol and drug use, or self-blame (De Vries et al., 2014; Lashbrook et al., 2018; Mutsaers et al., 2016). It has also been observed that marital status affects resilience and avoidant coping style, concluding that the partner plays an important role in the recovery from the survivors (Lai et al., 2020; Lashbrook et al., 2018; Ravindran et al., 2019). Remembering that 72 % of the participants are single, it leads us to consider further the hypothesis that an avoidant coping style is associated with those low levels of fear of recurrence.

Conclusions

The CARS-M scale shows adequate psychometric properties for its use in the screening and evaluation process of Mexican breast cancer survivors and in clinical and virtual settings.

In general terms, Mexican breast cancer survivors has low (31 %) to moderate (24 %) levels of fear of recurrence. Scores that fall within the world reported range (39- 97 %) with 70 % showing some degree of fear, 78 % in the present study (NCCN, 2022; Simard et al., 2013; Thewes et al., 2012). And the main concern derived from a possible recurrence is that related to the risk of losing their life as was reported by Vickberg (2003), Lai et al., (2020), Lengacher et al., (2016) or Mutsaers et al., (2016).

The study has some limitations such as the use of a convenience sample, affecting the external validity as it has little representativeness capacity to generalize the results. With this, it is suggested to expand the sample by randomly selecting from different hospitals. Equally, it is suggested to simultaneously study coping styles to obtain better conclusions on the subject. Finally, the use of a structured clinical interview to determine the clinical levels of fear of recurrence more accurately as proposed by Mutsaers et al. (2016) and Simard and Savard (2015).

References:

American Cancer Society. (2022). Cancer Treatment & Survivorship Facts & Figures 2022-2024. American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/survivor-facts-figures.htmlLinks ]

Batista-Foguet, J. M., Coenders, G., & Alonso, J. (2004). Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Medicina Clínica, 122(Supl.1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1157/13057542Links ]

Carretero Dios, H. & Pérez Meléndez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 5(3), 521-551. [ Links ]

De Vries, J., Den Oudsten, B. L., Jacobs, P. M. E. P., & Roukema, J. A. (2014). How breast cancer survivors cope with fear of recurrence: a focus group study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2(3), 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2025-yLinks ]

Finney, S. & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and Categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. Hancock & R. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 269-314). Information Age Publishing. [ Links ]

Fiszer, C., Dolbeault, S., Sultan, S., & Brédart, A. (2014). Prevalence, intensity, and predictors of the supportive care needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 23(4), 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3432Links ]

Galindo Vázquez, O., Benjet, C., Juárez García, F., Rojas Castillo, E., Riveros Rosas, A., Aguilar Ponce, J. L., & Álvarez Avitia, M. Á. (2015). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión (HADS) en una población de pacientes oncológicos mexicanos. Salud mental, 38(4), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2015.035Links ]

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2016). Metodología de la Investigación (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [ Links ]

Herrero, J. (2010). El análisis factorial confirmatorio en el estudio de la estructura y estabilidad de los instrumentos de evaluación: un ejemplo con el Cuestionario de Autoestima CA-14. Psychosocial Intervention, 19(3), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2010v19n3a9Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. (2018). Registro de Supervivientes de cáncer en México (Folleto). [ Links ]

Jones, J. M., Olson, K., Catton, P., Catton, C. N., Fleshner, N. E., Krzyzanowska, M. K., McCready, D. R., Wong, R. K. S., Jiang, H., & Howell, D. (2016). Cancer-related fatigue and associated disability in post-treatment cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice, 10(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0450-2Links ]

Koller, M., Aaronson, N. K., Blazeby, J., Bottomley, A., Dewolf, L., Fayers, P., Johnson, C., Ramage, J., Scott, N., & West, K. (2007). Translation procedures for standardized quality of life questionnaires: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) approach. European Journal of Cancer, 43(12), 1810-1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.05.029Links ]

Lai, H. L., Hung, C. M., Chen, C. I., Shih, M. L., & Huang, C. Y. (2020). Resilience and coping styles as predictors of health outcomes in breast cancer patients: a structural equation modelling analysis. European Journal of Cancer Care, 29(1), e13161. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13161Links ]

Lashbrook, M. P., Valery, P. C., Knott, V., Kirshbaum, M. N., & Bernardes, C. M. (2018). Coping strategies used by breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: a literature review. Cancer Nursing, 41(5), E23-E39. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000528Links ]

Lengacher, C. A., Reich, R. R., Paterson, C. L., Ramesar, S., Park, J. Y., Alinat, C., Johnson-Mallard, V., Moscoso, M., Budhrani-Shani, P., Miladinovic, B., Jacobsen, P. B., Cox, C. E., Goodman, M., & Kip, K. E. (2016). Examination of Broad Symptom Improvement Resulting From Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(24), 2827-2834. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7874Links ]

Merckaert, I., Lewis, F., Delevallez, F., Herman, S., Caillier, M., Delvaux, N., Libert, Y., Liénard, A., Nogaret, J.-M., Ogez, D., Scalliet, P., Slachmuylder, J.-L., Van Houtte, P., & Razavi, D. (2017). Improving anxiety regulation in patients with breast cancer at the beginning of the survivorship period: A randomized clinical trial comparing the benefits of single-component and multiple-component group interventions. Psycho-Oncology, 26(8), 1147-1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4294Links ]

Momino, K., Akechi, T., Yamashita, T., Fujita, T., Hayahi, H., Tsunoda, N., Miyashita, M., & Iwata, H. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS-J). Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 44(5), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyu032Links ]

Mora-Ríos, J., Bautista-Aguilar, N., Natera, G., & Pedersen, D. (2013). Adaptación cultural de instrumentos de medida sobre estigma y enfermedad mental en la Ciudad de México. Salud Mental, 36(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2013.002Links ]

Morata-Ramirez, M. Á., Holgado Tello, F. P., Barbero-García, M. I., & Mendez, G. (2015). Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Recomendaciones sobre mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en función del error Tipo I de Ji-Cuadrado y RMSEA. Acción Psicológica, 12(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.12.1.14362Links ]

Mutsaers, B., Jones, G., Rutkowski, N., Tomei, C., Séguin Leclair, C., Petricone-Westwood, D., Simard, S., & Lebel, S. (2016). When fear of cancer recurrence becomes a clinical issue: A qualitative analysis of features associated with clinical fear of cancer recurrence. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(10), 4207-4218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3248-5Links ]

National Comprehensive Cancer Network . (2022). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Survivorship. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=3&id=1466Links ]

Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. McGraw-Hill. [ Links ]

Park, S. Y. & Lim, J. W. (2022). Cognitive behavioral therapy for reducing fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) among breast cancer survivors: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Cancer, 22, 217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08909-yLinks ]

Ravindran, O. S., Shankar, A., & Murthy, T. (2019). A Comparative Study on Perceived Stress, Coping, Quality of Life, and Hopelessness between Cancer Patients and Survivors. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 25(3), 414-420. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_1_19Links ]

Simard, S. & Savard, J. (2015). Screening and comorbidity of clinical levels of fear of cancer recurrence. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice, 9(3), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0424-4Links ]

Simard, S., Thewes, B., Humphris, G., Dixon, M., Hayden, C., Mireskandari, S., & Ozakinci, G. (2013). Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice, 7(3), 300-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0272-zLinks ]

Thewes, B., Butow, P., Zachariae, R., Christensen, S., Simard, S., & Gotay, C. (2012). Fear of cancer recurrence: A systematic literature review of self-report measures. Psycho-Oncology, 21(6), 571-587. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2070Links ]

van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. H. J., Peters, M. L., de Rijke, J. M., Schouten, H. C., van Kleef, M., & Patijn, J. (2008). Concerns of former breast cancer patients about disease recurrence: A validation and prevalence study. Psycho-Oncology, 17(11), 1137-1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1340Links ]

Vickberg, S. M. J. (2003). The Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS): a systematic measure of women’s fears about the possibility of breast cancer recurrence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2501_03Links ]

Funding: This work was supported by the Grant for Postgraduate Studies (N° 473223) from the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico as part of Phd studies; the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (PN 2015/1715) by the project “Efectos de una intervención cognitivo conductual sobre la adhesión al tratamiento, tabaquismo y calidad de vida, mediante la modificación de los estilos de afrontamiento en pacientes con cáncer de mama en inicio de tratamiento médico”; and the National Cancer Center in the USA (P30 CA008748)

How to cite: Ramírez-Orozco, M., Rojas-Russell, M. E., Galindo-Vázquez, O., Robles-García, R., Costas-Muñiz, R., Bargalló-Rocha, J. E. & Meneses-García, A. (2023). Concerns about cancer recurrence in Mexican women breast cancer survivors. Psychometric properties of the CARS scale. Ciencias Psicológicas, 17(1), e-2777. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.2777

Authors’ participation: a) Conception and design of the work; b) Data acquisition; c) Analysis and interpretation of data; d) Writing of the manuscript; e) Critical review of the manuscript. M. R.-O. has contributed in a, b, c, d; M. E. R.-R. in a, c, d, e; O. G.-V. in a, b, c, e; R. R.-G. in a, d, e; R. C.-M. in a, d, e; J. E. B.-R. in a, b, e; A. M.-G. in c, d, e.

Scientific editor in-charge: Dra. Cecilia Cracco

Received: January 01, 2022; Accepted: March 28, 2023

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License