SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número30El rol del juez de garantía en el debate de medidas cautelares personales. Revisión normativa de los sistemas procesales penales de Chile, Uruguay y Argentina federalLa perspicacia de los derechos fundamentales para los refugiados: un estudio de Brasil y Uruguay índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista de Derecho (Universidad Católica Dámaso A. Larrañaga, Facultad de Derecho)

versión impresa ISSN 1510-3714versión On-line ISSN 2393-6193

Resumen

RISSO FERRAND, Martín et al. Medical writ of mandamus in recent Uruguayan jurisprudence. Rev. Derecho [online]. 2024, n.30, e4205.  Epub 01-Dic-2024. ISSN 1510-3714.  https://doi.org/10.22235/rd30.4205.

To complete two previous investigations about the writ of mandamus or injunction -excluding those writs to deliver medication or special medical treatments-, the jurisprudence of the last two years was reviewed from both the First Instance Courts of Montevideo and the Appeal Courts. It broke off with clearly discouraging results because Uruguayan courts have very restrictive criteria regarding de admissibility of this constitutional and international guarantee and a surprising situation was reached: just as most petitions for protection are rejected by the courts, the opposite happens when a petition for protection is filed for medical reasons. An attempt was made to find some causes for this difference in criteria

Palabras clave : writ of injunction; writ of mandamus; constitutional guarantees; right to health.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )