SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue38Oral health care beliefs among caregivers of the institutionalized elderly in Antofagasta, Chile, 2019Presurgical orthopedics in patients with cleft lip and palate: nutrition, aesthetics and gap between maxillary segments. A systematic review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Related links

Share


Odontoestomatología

Print version ISSN 0797-0374On-line version ISSN 1688-9339

Abstract

HEMPEL SOUPER, Germán; SAT YABER, María Ignacia; VARGAS AGUILAR, Valeria  and  DIAZ MUNOZ, Alejandro. Evidence-based comparison of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Odontoestomatología [online]. 2021, vol.23, n.38, e302.  Epub Sep 30, 2021. ISSN 0797-0374.  https://doi.org/10.22592/ode2021n37e302.

Self-ligating brackets include a locking mechanism that holds the archwire in the bracket slot. They were created primarily to create a lower friction system, allowing for more efficient sliding mechanics and reducing treatment time.

Objective:

This review aims to present all the information available on different self-ligating devices, whether active or passive, in a structured and organized way. This paper sets out to compare their qualities with each other and with conventional devices.

Method:

A search was conducted in PubMed and Epistemonikos, regardless of language or year of publication.

Results:

Comparisons were made of both active and passive self-ligating brackets and self-ligating brackets with conventional brackets in different clinical situations.

Conclusions

No statistically significant difference was found in most clinical situations, except for torque expression, where conventional brackets have a more significant advantage.

Keywords : Orthodontic brackets; Self-ligating brackets; Conventional brackets.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )