SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número1Anestesia subaracnoidea con ropivacaína hiperbárica versus bupivacaína hiperbárica asociadas a fentanilo para operación cesárea de urgencia.: Ensayo clínico controlado con asignación aleatoriaManejo anestésico en un recién nacido portador de hernia diafragmática derecha bajo soporte ventilatorio de alta frecuencia oscilatoria.: Reporte de un caso clínico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Links relacionados

Compartir


Anestesia Analgesia Reanimación

versión On-line ISSN 1688-1273

Resumen

RANDO, Karina; PRATT, Juan Pablo  y  CASTELLI, Jorge. Cateterización venosa central guiada por ecografía: estudio randomizado controlado. Anest Analg Reanim [online]. 2013, vol.26, n.1, pp.5-5. ISSN 1688-1273.

SUMMARY  Background: in our country, there are no studies on critical care or anesthesia that analyze the usefulness of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization. Objective: to compare the degree of difficulty of central venous line (CVL) placement with or without ultrasound guidance and the incidence of complications and to determine whether the level of training of the operator or the neck anatomy affects the results. Methods: there were studied 257 patients, classified according to the experience of the operator: "experienced=E" (over 70 central accesses carried out before trial) and "non-experienced =NE". Group "E" performed 152 venous accesses and group "NE" 105. All patients who required CVL in the CCE and operation room of the HCFFAA as from the beginning of the trial were included. Procedures were randomized as per "without ultrasound=Wo/U" (80-"E" and 54-"NE") and "with ultrasound=W/U" (72-"E" and 51-"NE"). Results: there were more correct placements of CVLs in group "E" than in group "NE" (88% vs.79%; p 0.04). There were also more correct placements in group "W/U" than in group "Wo/U" (91% vs. 78%; p=0.005). No significant difference existed in correct placement related to the type of neck (p=0.06). General incidence of complications was 11.7%. There is no difference between groups "W/U" (8.1%) and "Wo/U" (14.9%); p=0.09. However, when comparing groups "E" and "NE", the second group presented advantages in terms of reduction of complications using ultrasound guidance: 7.8% W/U vs. 24% Wo/U (p=0.03).

Palabras clave : CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; ULTRASOUND; ANESTHESIA; TRAINING.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons