Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Related links
Share
Revista Uruguaya de Cardiología
Print version ISSN 0797-0048On-line version ISSN 1688-0420
Abstract
FERNANDEZ, Amparo et al. Early anticoagulation with warfarin in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Randomized prospective trial. Interim analysis. Rev.Urug.Cardiol. [online]. 2024, vol.39, n.1, e202. Epub Dec 01, 2024. ISSN 0797-0048. https://doi.org/10.29277/cardio.39.1.4.
Introduction:
although bioprostheses are less thrombogenic than mechanical valves, bioprosthesis valve thrombosis is an increasingly recognized entity that can cause potentially reversible prosthetic valve dysfunction. There is a lack of consensus whether to use anticoagulation after aortic valve replacement (AVR) or antiplatelet therapy. Our hypothesis is that early anticoagulation is associated with lower transprosthetic gradients with similar risk of complications.
Objective:
primary objective is to determine if there is a significant difference in the variation of the mean transprosthetic gradient (ΔGm) one year after SVA between the two antithrombotic treatment strategies. Secondary objectives are the comparison of the variation of maximum gradient and aortic valve area, and clinical parameters including NYHA functional class, major and minor bleeding rates, and the incidence of embolic events. This work represents the 3-month interim analysis of a longer-term project, and is intended to show the preliminary results of the previously defined end points.
Methods:
this is an interim analysis of a multicenter randomized trial. All patients who underwent AVR by porcine bioprostheses were successively recruited in two cardiac surgery centers in Montevideo between 01/01/2019 and 01/09/2019. The anticoagulation group received warfarin for 3 months. Both groups received aspirin. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up consultations were performed before discharge, at 3 months, and at 1 year.
Results: 107 patients were recruited, 46% were randomized to the anticoagulation group and 54% to the control group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the variation between discharge and 3 months of effective orifice area, doppler velocity index, peak gradient and mean gradient. There were also no differences between both groups in functional class. Regarding complications, there were no embolic events and bleeding did not differ significantly.
Conclusions:
in this study, anticoagulation did not modify the variation of transprosthetic gradients at 3 months. Likewise, it did not produce a higher incidence of adverse effects. It remains unclear whether early anticoagulation with warfarin after AVR has an impact on long-term outcomes.
Keywords : AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; BIOPROSTHESIS; ANTICOAGULATION; BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE THROMBOSIS; THROMBOEMBOLISM; ECHOCARDIOGRAM.