SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 número4Estudo da prevalência, fatores associados e resultados da ventilação mecânica prolongada na UTI como característica distintiva da doença crítica crônicaReinternações hospitalares não programadas e fatores de risco associados em serviços de medicina interna e pneumologia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista Médica del Uruguay

versão impressa ISSN 0303-3295versão On-line ISSN 1688-0390

Resumo

GARCIA, Laura et al. Comparison of HPV typing performance and the Pap test as triage methods in the detection of cervical cancer and its precursor lesions in the ESTAMPA-Uruguay Project. Rev. Méd. Urug. [online]. 2024, vol.40, n.4, e203.  Epub 15-Nov-2024. ISSN 0303-3295.  https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.40.4.3.

Introduction:

Human Papillomavirus (HPV), which has a high prevalence, causes cervical cancer in a low percentage of infections. HPV detection should be completed with a triage test that identifies women at higher risk of developing cancer.

Objective:

To analyze the best triage strategies for detecting precancerous lesions and cervical cancer.

Method:

The study is retrospective and observational. A Pap test, HPV test, and typing were performed on 1.984 women during the period 2014-2019. The performance of partial typing for HPV 16/18 combined with cytology (algorithm A) was analyzed against cytology without typing (algorithm B) for triaging HPV-positive women in primary screening.

Results:

12,5% of the women were HPV positive. Twenty-seven cases of CIN2+ were detected (10,8% of the positives). The sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ in HPV-positive women was greater for algorithm A than for B (A=77,7% vs B=44,4%, p=0,006). The specificity was higher for cytology without typing (A=68,7% vs B=77,2%, p=0,002) but with a lower detection rate for CIN2+. The positive predictive value (PPV) was similar (A=26,2% vs B=21,8%, p=0,30). The negative predictive value (NPV) was higher for genotyping with cytology (A=95,5% vs B=90,6%, p=0,014). The absolute risk for CIN2+ was 34,1% (95% CI 20,0-50,5) for genotypes 16/18 and 8,7% (95% CI 4,4-15,0) for other high-risk genotypes.

Conclusions:

Partial typing of HPV followed by cytology presents a greater sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ lesions and is more efficient in ruling out disease compared to cytology as a triage method. HPV genotypes 16/18 should be referred for colposcopy.

Palavras-chave : Uterine cervical neoplasms; Papillomavirus infections; Papanicolaou test; Screening; Human papillomavirus DNA tests.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )