SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 issue4Study of the prevalence, associated factors, and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation in ICU as a distinctive feature of chronic critical illnessUnscheduled hospital readmissions and associated risk factors in internal medicine and pulmonology services author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Related links

Share


Revista Médica del Uruguay

Print version ISSN 0303-3295On-line version ISSN 1688-0390

Abstract

GARCIA, Laura et al. Comparison of HPV typing performance and the Pap test as triage methods in the detection of cervical cancer and its precursor lesions in the ESTAMPA-Uruguay Project. Rev. Méd. Urug. [online]. 2024, vol.40, n.4, e203.  Epub Nov 15, 2024. ISSN 0303-3295.  https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.40.4.3.

Introduction:

Human Papillomavirus (HPV), which has a high prevalence, causes cervical cancer in a low percentage of infections. HPV detection should be completed with a triage test that identifies women at higher risk of developing cancer.

Objective:

To analyze the best triage strategies for detecting precancerous lesions and cervical cancer.

Method:

The study is retrospective and observational. A Pap test, HPV test, and typing were performed on 1.984 women during the period 2014-2019. The performance of partial typing for HPV 16/18 combined with cytology (algorithm A) was analyzed against cytology without typing (algorithm B) for triaging HPV-positive women in primary screening.

Results:

12,5% of the women were HPV positive. Twenty-seven cases of CIN2+ were detected (10,8% of the positives). The sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ in HPV-positive women was greater for algorithm A than for B (A=77,7% vs B=44,4%, p=0,006). The specificity was higher for cytology without typing (A=68,7% vs B=77,2%, p=0,002) but with a lower detection rate for CIN2+. The positive predictive value (PPV) was similar (A=26,2% vs B=21,8%, p=0,30). The negative predictive value (NPV) was higher for genotyping with cytology (A=95,5% vs B=90,6%, p=0,014). The absolute risk for CIN2+ was 34,1% (95% CI 20,0-50,5) for genotypes 16/18 and 8,7% (95% CI 4,4-15,0) for other high-risk genotypes.

Conclusions:

Partial typing of HPV followed by cytology presents a greater sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ lesions and is more efficient in ruling out disease compared to cytology as a triage method. HPV genotypes 16/18 should be referred for colposcopy.

Keywords : Uterine cervical neoplasms; Papillomavirus infections; Papanicolaou test; Screening; Human papillomavirus DNA tests.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )